toxicbitcoiner on Nostr: A 100x from here would put Bitcoin’s market cap at $130T, or 14.44% of global ...
A 100x from here would put Bitcoin’s market cap at $130T, or 14.44% of global wealth (in 2024 dollars.) That price of $6.6M/BTC would actually buy you slightly more than $6.6M worth of stuff, in today’s dollars. Why?
Because some of the monetary premium of stuff you would buy (mainly houses, but also yield bearing equities and bonds) was sucked up by Bitcoin to get it to 14.44%.
As you can see in the chart, the difference between the nominal price and purchasing power increases exponentially as Bitcoin becomes a greater share of total global wealth.
What will Bitcoin’s final equilibrium share of total global wealth be? It’s anyone’s guess. Saylor thinks 50%, which I think is very logical and a good lower bound.
Personally, I think it will be even higher because of not just the grotesque amount of leverage that props up real estate ($330T) and equity values ($115T) that will get flushed out, but bonds ($300T) and base money ($120T) getting marked down by say -80%.
70% is a particularly romantic target because that would be $ to sat parity, or $100M/BTC in today’s purchasing power, despite only a $30M/BTC price.
What do you think Bitcoin’s final equilibrium share will be and why?
Thinking it’s “too late” for you to get into bitcoin is an illusion of the ego.
Sure you didn’t get in at $6 or even $6,000 and others who did are higher status than you. Put that aside. That’s your ego fucking with you.
This isn’t about pride, it’s just about money.
We are still early in bitcoins story.
$66,000 is still cheap believe it or not.
We have 100x left to go at a minimum.
Your ego is not your amigo, it’s trying to keep you from riches.
Do not listen to it.
Published at
2024-03-07 03:45:43Event JSON
{
"id": "056bb79853906a5dc608409df7c96f50325e61497236b0bd82c39d57092f6ebd",
"pubkey": "e1fc88f8e378784587c2337f4eb90a46c0c0622c42e77d75ec4a37521f30f622",
"created_at": 1709783143,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"q",
"05b0e4f30ca55f1d395c646d8bb53558b814e4d382a8ddce1c2cbc6f7f32d4f2"
],
[
"p",
"1afe0c74e3d7784eba93a5e3fa554a6eeb01928d12739ae8ba4832786808e36d"
],
[
"imeta",
"url https://image.nostr.build/4a2c8b5b367424afde06c026763fd347d48a9439eeab4d1e784a4a68ffe46efc.jpg",
"blurhash e3S$ovxv.8%MRj_4bcjYWAM{tlsm?HozM{-pWAo}kDRjRkkW%MROMx",
"dim 934x660"
],
[
"p",
"1afe0c74e3d7784eba93a5e3fa554a6eeb01928d12739ae8ba4832786808e36d"
],
[
"r",
"https://image.nostr.build/4a2c8b5b367424afde06c026763fd347d48a9439eeab4d1e784a4a68ffe46efc.jpg"
]
],
"content": "A 100x from here would put Bitcoin’s market cap at $130T, or 14.44% of global wealth (in 2024 dollars.) That price of $6.6M/BTC would actually buy you slightly more than $6.6M worth of stuff, in today’s dollars. Why?\n\nBecause some of the monetary premium of stuff you would buy (mainly houses, but also yield bearing equities and bonds) was sucked up by Bitcoin to get it to 14.44%.\n\nAs you can see in the chart, the difference between the nominal price and purchasing power increases exponentially as Bitcoin becomes a greater share of total global wealth.\n\nWhat will Bitcoin’s final equilibrium share of total global wealth be? It’s anyone’s guess. Saylor thinks 50%, which I think is very logical and a good lower bound.\n\nPersonally, I think it will be even higher because of not just the grotesque amount of leverage that props up real estate ($330T) and equity values ($115T) that will get flushed out, but bonds ($300T) and base money ($120T) getting marked down by say -80%. \n\n70% is a particularly romantic target because that would be $ to sat parity, or $100M/BTC in today’s purchasing power, despite only a $30M/BTC price.\n\nWhat do you think Bitcoin’s final equilibrium share will be and why? https://image.nostr.build/4a2c8b5b367424afde06c026763fd347d48a9439eeab4d1e784a4a68ffe46efc.jpg nostr:note1qkcwfucv54036w2uv3kchdf4tzupfexns25dmnsu9j7x7lej6neqdxezg5",
"sig": "c2f3c0a0199bb7a2ec28fcdfff7a937a1742aebdd37d2ebe1a637746b2cb6328b6ba415a9e0057787b995f70e91dad5a1bf36576c4781b2879d5d0a232203240"
}
