📅 Original date posted:2019-11-07
📝 Original message:
On 07/11/2019 16:43, Joost Jager wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:36 PM lisa neigut <niftynei at gmail.com
> <mailto:niftynei at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > Imagine the following setup: a network of nodes that trust each
> other
>
> The goal of this pre-payment proposal is to remove the need for
> trusted parties
>
>
> Trust isn't the right word. It is a level of service that you provide
> to your peers. If nodes are cognizant of the fact that the level of
> service they receive goes down if they forward spam, they will be
> careful on the incoming side. Require peers to build up a reputation
> before increasing the inbound limits that apply to the channels with them.
We can learn from the current situation in emails, that a system based
on reputation tends to concentrate the power in the hands of few big and
strong actors (gmail and co). If we have from the beginning a mechanism
to fight against spam by paying to send message, we can perhaps have a
really distributed system which cannot be censured.
Yaacov Akiba Slama [ARCHIVE] /
npub1z0…at6uz
2023-06-09 12:57:13
in reply to nevent1q…qdk9
Author Public Key
npub1z07sgdx84scq77jx3fddj3jt0w2w3vpa0t5gyk0nmcaggs3gyt7s6at6uzPublished at
2023-06-09 12:57:13Event JSON
{
"id": "2129a45d5098f047ffd98444309d152a429093db9ce02f0d2b248afc982b58d1",
"pubkey": "13fd0434c7ac300f7a468a5ad9464b7b94e8b03d7ae88259f3de3a84422822fd",
"created_at": 1686315433,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0c91e21e034533f122e94b0fd3031654ae905512e27a1262e64ae8c7923a76b8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"15a58be69a0724e3dcce1f858f783d379e18eafc747362acafef4b6e4f2972ed",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ec3fb08b335b94aace30d13181f2ad0280df9bc34f1a99832c4e2da8fb125eb3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-11-07\n📝 Original message:\nOn 07/11/2019 16:43, Joost Jager wrote:\n\u003e On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:36 PM lisa neigut \u003cniftynei at gmail.com \n\u003e \u003cmailto:niftynei at gmail.com\u003e\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e Imagine the following setup: a network of nodes that trust each\n\u003e other\n\u003e\n\u003e The goal of this pre-payment proposal is to remove the need for\n\u003e trusted parties\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Trust isn't the right word. It is a level of service that you provide \n\u003e to your peers. If nodes are cognizant of the fact that the level of \n\u003e service they receive goes down if they forward spam, they will be \n\u003e careful on the incoming side. Require peers to build up a reputation \n\u003e before increasing the inbound limits that apply to the channels with them.\nWe can learn from the current situation in emails, that a system based \non reputation tends to concentrate the power in the hands of few big and \nstrong actors (gmail and co). If we have from the beginning a mechanism \nto fight against spam by paying to send message, we can perhaps have a \nreally distributed system which cannot be censured.",
"sig": "a26ef37f7df2037b2a59961e56fb25854d2372de9f17b18e554eb21c8858846e95fff9972d801ed11d92604691d2bd68ad891e53b3abf0b23910e56d9e928cab"
}