📅 Original date posted:2013-10-24
📝 Original message:Well, miners are all supposed to be more or less equivalent - modulo
differences in tx acceptance policies - so I'd hope that having out of bad
fee mechanisms yet still broadcasting the TX isn't that common. If it was
broadcasted, it should get mined in short order, otherwise things are going
wrong.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> Anyway, in what circumstance would a customer want an exclusive contract
> with a miner?
>
I was thinking for transactions that aren't standard so have to be
submitted to miners directly.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131024/de348db5/attachment.html>;
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 15:07:53
in reply to nevent1q…ct09
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 15:07:53Event JSON
{
"id": "223eaef525be21128b4419703834b9628b96028c62b93f798cc4de02548959f3",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686150473,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"82aca9d85d9f8088587f8710d511958183b300f7daa0a8fd33090fc324b509ac",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cf8befad38134a863fc0292a8e20f6fdbc1d0864ac8a1664266ab946456b14b9",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-10-24\n📝 Original message:Well, miners are all supposed to be more or less equivalent - modulo\ndifferences in tx acceptance policies - so I'd hope that having out of bad\nfee mechanisms yet still broadcasting the TX isn't that common. If it was\nbroadcasted, it should get mined in short order, otherwise things are going\nwrong.\n\nOn Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Anyway, in what circumstance would a customer want an exclusive contract\n\u003e with a miner?\n\u003e\n\nI was thinking for transactions that aren't standard so have to be\nsubmitted to miners directly.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131024/de348db5/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "5422d1a4f2e8b85b8ab58c6da6d377a26e666ec35fca7eb8ad84b73e8b3199f08821e9300f4443bff2b2804409b4c6f305bb1f548547a77de1a727a83e711eb7"
}