📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08
📝 Original message:Hello,
At DevCore London, Gavin mentioned the idea that we could get rid of
sending full blocks. Instead, newly minted blocks would only be
distributed as block headers plus all hashes of the transactions
included in the block. The assumption would be that nodes have already
the majority of these transactions in their mempool.
The advantages are clear: it's more efficient, as we would send
transactions only once over the network, and it's fast as the resulting
blocks would be small. Moreover, we would get rid of the blocksize limit
for a long time.
Unfortunately, I am too ignorant of bitcoin core's internals to judge
the changes required to make this happen. (I guess we'd require a new
block format and a way to bulk-request missing transactions.)
However, I'm curious to hear what others with a better grasp of bitcoin
core's internals have to say about it.
Regards,
Arne
Arne Brutschy [ARCHIVE] /
npub1na…gn6n0
2023-06-07 15:34:15
in reply to nevent1q…n6sg
Author Public Key
npub1nannayg2dy65q9hrtzh8e93tk0c2twle2ae96lqtcutfxqvev07s6gn6n0Published at
2023-06-07 15:34:15Event JSON
{
"id": "2360173fe6e36e33680679818a74a19735f3e98dbff3bb627e172b1d018b59de",
"pubkey": "9f673e910a69354016e358ae7c962bb3f0a5bbf957725d7c0bc71693019963fd",
"created_at": 1686152055,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0c518493ed904814732e6808d5e3e817d3a39ca08254ecc3f7f74b61b0ba2815",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08\n📝 Original message:Hello,\n\nAt DevCore London, Gavin mentioned the idea that we could get rid of \nsending full blocks. Instead, newly minted blocks would only be \ndistributed as block headers plus all hashes of the transactions \nincluded in the block. The assumption would be that nodes have already \nthe majority of these transactions in their mempool.\n\nThe advantages are clear: it's more efficient, as we would send \ntransactions only once over the network, and it's fast as the resulting \nblocks would be small. Moreover, we would get rid of the blocksize limit \nfor a long time.\n\nUnfortunately, I am too ignorant of bitcoin core's internals to judge \nthe changes required to make this happen. (I guess we'd require a new \nblock format and a way to bulk-request missing transactions.)\n\nHowever, I'm curious to hear what others with a better grasp of bitcoin \ncore's internals have to say about it.\n\nRegards,\nArne",
"sig": "d9e3e84c141feb4c01f60962240408be27cca734c93d763a8f776a08dbe1020661601a3e5deed992d08113e2058d881dc8ee395ed26bca3c2ed58aa68908436c"
}