JohnBNevin on Nostr: Although there are probably a few, it's the wrong question, IMO. To find the ...
Although there are probably a few, it's the wrong question, IMO.
To find the revolution, what authors are:
a) Banned from making Twitter threads
b) Think asking people to 'subscribe to my substack' for the cost of a meal per day is offensive and/or disagree with Substack's user agreement and/or haven't the 'clout' to draw income with a paywall
c) Aren't being found on Ghost.org
d) self-custody their independent, free writing, and therefore are banned from the network effects of ever having a chance to be found on a search engine
e) work at centralized archive companies/services / National Archives
f) create scholarly articles yet understand that the gatekeeping peer review process is corrupt
Or if you must chase those who are already successful in a paradigm that does not reward free thinking,
- successful bloggers who can crosspost to nostr for mutual benefit
Published at
2024-05-28 15:24:11Event JSON
{
"id": "275b3dae9f40a5619496e91d963b6fbfbd8dc8a740546ce294e4007a5df36251",
"pubkey": "633f317e99bc5a55c85d842784989a2bcdc31bea3c4c01fdfc80fd340facca3a",
"created_at": 1716909851,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b4804bce3afe04ac26b78ae05c4095d07aa09b5d310c4408654fbefcbff6722",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6b4804bce3afe04ac26b78ae05c4095d07aa09b5d310c4408654fbefcbff6722",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7bdef7be22dd8e59f4600e044aa53a1cf975a9dc7d27df5833bc77db784a5805",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "Although there are probably a few, it's the wrong question, IMO.\nTo find the revolution, what authors are: \na) Banned from making Twitter threads\nb) Think asking people to 'subscribe to my substack' for the cost of a meal per day is offensive and/or disagree with Substack's user agreement and/or haven't the 'clout' to draw income with a paywall\nc) Aren't being found on Ghost.org\nd) self-custody their independent, free writing, and therefore are banned from the network effects of ever having a chance to be found on a search engine\ne) work at centralized archive companies/services / National Archives\nf) create scholarly articles yet understand that the gatekeeping peer review process is corrupt\n\nOr if you must chase those who are already successful in a paradigm that does not reward free thinking,\n\n- successful bloggers who can crosspost to nostr for mutual benefit",
"sig": "deafe68b07fbf235280a878346a34f75563a324a9631d34efca379c030691030962093d2ba19f373437071fa676da7ca3411c2d88af3ccec86e4d96b0b542504"
}