đź“… Original date posted:2015-08-17
đź“ť Original message:On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Oliver Egginger <bitcoin at olivere.de> wrote:
> Am 17.08.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Jorge TimĂłn:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Oliver Egginger <bitcoin at olivere.de> wrote:
>>> Am 17.08.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Jorge TimĂłn:
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 17, 2015 1:40 PM, "Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev"
>>>> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>>> <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>>>>> That made it to the news and is now discussed in various places. Could
>>>>> you please delete Satoshis old email addresses from the list and block
>>>>> them? Sorry to post this to all members but I can't find an owner for
>>>>> this list.
>>>>
>>>> Why should we block any email address?
>>>
>>> To avoid such discussions.
>>
>> You mean to avoid discussions about his authenticity?
>> Should that matter at all?
>> Does the content of the post matter less than its author?
>
> It just creates confusion. Particularly in the media. I also find it
> unfair if people abuses Satoshi's name to submit their personal views on
> an issue.
Yes, people have been abusing his name in the block size debate to
present their own personal views, almost from the beginning, and that
has been very annoying.
But I don't remember you proposing to block their emails from the list
in those occasions.
For all I know this could have been the real Satoshi. But I just
maintain what I've said when arguments of authority (an old fallacy)
have been used: only the arguments matter, not who makes them (which
is also what logic says).
Maybe the people using the arguments of authority actually care about
whether the author is Satoshi or not to determine what they think
about what the content says.
But I personally don't care: I can say that I agree with what the post
says no matter if it is written by Satoshi or someone else (because
the identity of the author doesn't change what I think of the
content).
Jorge TimĂłn [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 15:47:23
in reply to nevent1q…2qr8
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Seen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 15:47:23Event JSON
{
"id": "275e2766b600ff80afefdbcb60ce579589a62a55c33b11c75f9089a48b2e6a26",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686152843,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c2ea875b0594d5635a2a5ab9721c10059f40c62d11975dcc679e649aa5cf3f34",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6274638988ab7f7769eb3c27e547ff99bae2aacc30da97ae7eae7439a2b98483",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3a8398eaf86054cebf4533f474e00bf3a274ddb71a6dbb99b3f83bc835acdf30"
]
],
"content": "đź“… Original date posted:2015-08-17\nđź“ť Original message:On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Oliver Egginger \u003cbitcoin at olivere.de\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Am 17.08.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Jorge TimĂłn:\n\u003e\u003e On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Oliver Egginger \u003cbitcoin at olivere.de\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\u003e Am 17.08.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Jorge TimĂłn:\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e On Aug 17, 2015 1:40 PM, \"Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev\"\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e \u003cmailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e That made it to the news and is now discussed in various places. Could\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e you please delete Satoshis old email addresses from the list and block\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e them? Sorry to post this to all members but I can't find an owner for\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e this list.\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\u003e Why should we block any email address?\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\u003e To avoid such discussions.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e You mean to avoid discussions about his authenticity?\n\u003e\u003e Should that matter at all?\n\u003e\u003e Does the content of the post matter less than its author?\n\u003e\n\u003e It just creates confusion. Particularly in the media. I also find it\n\u003e unfair if people abuses Satoshi's name to submit their personal views on\n\u003e an issue.\n\nYes, people have been abusing his name in the block size debate to\npresent their own personal views, almost from the beginning, and that\nhas been very annoying.\nBut I don't remember you proposing to block their emails from the list\nin those occasions.\nFor all I know this could have been the real Satoshi. But I just\nmaintain what I've said when arguments of authority (an old fallacy)\nhave been used: only the arguments matter, not who makes them (which\nis also what logic says).\nMaybe the people using the arguments of authority actually care about\nwhether the author is Satoshi or not to determine what they think\nabout what the content says.\nBut I personally don't care: I can say that I agree with what the post\nsays no matter if it is written by Satoshi or someone else (because\nthe identity of the author doesn't change what I think of the\ncontent).",
"sig": "bd5e111f69d10f96e33e2b0b55120292e93ee8740bd07d1aa652099d6f5f68db16b3c39f382558c0b6aede0054bfe46becee356deddad1662950d97fcac8c013"
}