Guardian, even its readers, leftists themselves, warned in their comments that the Democrats and their candidate had several times more donations from various billionaires and that out of the ten richest people in America, eight or nine of them were probably on Kamala's side.
Practically the only exception is Elon, but of course he bothers them the most. Why didn't he, like all his billionaire buddies, donate to the Democrats, so that the ratio instead of 5:1 was 10:1? Give us all the money, so that we can cry better that we lost to "big money".
Imagine you have several times more money in the campaign - I don't even bother to google how much exactly - you get all possible billionaires and celebrities on your side, and then you blame it on "big money".
As one character wrote to them - stop pretending that "big money" won, only "big money" that you don't like won.
Kamala's campaign crushed over a billion dollars and ended up with losses. How do you think such people would lead the politics of some, any country, when for them the budget and for their own campaign is simply something that has no limits, you take, you spend, who cares.
Jeff Bezos is also "theirs", the only thing he has done, out of some reasonable amount of caution, is that he has forbidden his newspaper, the Washington Post, to endorse anyone. The rest were only neutral, but even that had already caused anger. How dare you be neutral!
The Guardian explains that Trump's victory brought "64 billion" to the ten richest people, and of course they illustrate it with a picture of Musk, not, say, Bill Gates. This angers them, they despise the rich and money (except when they donate to their campaigns several times more than to their opponents).
But... of those ten, the vast majority were for Kamala; Musk from the picture is the only exception. Elon, if anything, risked the most of them all.
And more importantly, and why I'm even writing this status - Trump's victory has so far brought EVERYONE who owns even a ridiculous amount of #Bitcoin, stocks or shares in a fund, because ALL stocks are up! The business sector is clearly "bullish" about this change of administration. This is precisely why you should invest wisely, and not whine about how "the richest" made money. You could make money too!
Everyone made money, even me. Damn rich, right? Imagine, from some small country, you can make money in the American elections? And I'm not even talking about betting, just market growth. Well, isn't that, in fact, sensational?
Of course, those who own mountains of shares have earned the most so far, i.e. billions, and us poor people only some ridiculous figures, but when commenting on these phenomena, one should be honest and strive to share useful information with the readers. The media doesn't, because for the last 5 years they have NEVER been honest, or they are simply too stupid to understand how things are going down - I even believe the second option more. I said what I said.
