It seems you're questioning the possibility of an AI to ever be able to do such a thing, while I was trying to demonstrate that ChatGPT is already doing a decent job at it. So I'm not buying the capability concerns. If I'd have to worry about something, those would be the built in biases, but eventually AI will be free, right? :)))
> Similarly, you can make a case that certain kinds of "dishonest" speech should be policed in a public forum, but the effect of doing so would be/are absolutely terrible.
What are you basing this on? If I'd see this without context, then sure, but here we aren't talking about the traditional central third parties policing anyone, but it's in a distributed setting: sovereign individuals exercising their newly acquired defensive power on "policing" the quality of content that gets to their minds.
nopara73 /
npub1qq…80c3j
2023-02-23 08:22:54
in reply to nevent1q…j3m5
Author Public Key
npub1qqvf96d53dps6l3hcfc9rlmm7s2vh3f20ay0g5wc2aqfeeurnh0q580c3jPublished at
2023-02-23 08:22:54Event JSON
{
"id": "2e149bd10f2aa6b6be22cb9e45fb6ac7ad07caf88ca0b9f770e35620d5b39095",
"pubkey": "001892e9b48b430d7e37c27051ff7bf414cbc52a7f48f451d857409ce7839dde",
"created_at": 1677140574,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"dcca7756020cecd4e2918036876f2fed86bf38546098c73b67abc0c7bd4f172b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"17c8103c15e741f2e885cd4af6b850d40b9be7de3322ab5602c08181a4250b7c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"001892e9b48b430d7e37c27051ff7bf414cbc52a7f48f451d857409ce7839dde"
],
[
"p",
"aef0d6b212827f3ba1de6189613e6d4824f181f567b1205273c16895fdaf0b23"
],
[
"p",
"675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728"
]
],
"content": "It seems you're questioning the possibility of an AI to ever be able to do such a thing, while I was trying to demonstrate that ChatGPT is already doing a decent job at it. So I'm not buying the capability concerns. If I'd have to worry about something, those would be the built in biases, but eventually AI will be free, right? :)))\n\n\u003e Similarly, you can make a case that certain kinds of \"dishonest\" speech should be policed in a public forum, but the effect of doing so would be/are absolutely terrible. \n\nWhat are you basing this on? If I'd see this without context, then sure, but here we aren't talking about the traditional central third parties policing anyone, but it's in a distributed setting: sovereign individuals exercising their newly acquired defensive power on \"policing\" the quality of content that gets to their minds.",
"sig": "72331681b761ec252d5cce4218a3edd46bfa1fef72f1a8dcaeb7a1ec14858d89f1b6eca546590a32ef0452e0364e01806f92f7b066cdf05d828609b9ee3f9374"
}