João Valente [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2020-12-01 📝 Original message: Hello ZmnSCPxj, Thank you ...

📅 Original date posted:2020-12-01
📝 Original message:
Hello ZmnSCPxj,

Thank you for taking the time to read the paper and sending over some
feedback, can't stress enough how important that is.
I took a look at the `feeadjuster` plugin for C-Lightning and although it
goes in the same direction as LDR in the sense that it allows for better
routes by signalling channel balance availability. It does it through a
dynamic fee adjustment though, where LDR is more explicit and goes one step
further, directly sharing channel balance information. I'm not sure how
these two solutions would compare in practice though but I imagine that
sharing more information would give LDR a performance edge.
Oh, and there's no need for a spec change. It could work as a separated LN
overlay network.

Completely agree on the false signalling idea, a node would not gain any
more routing traffic by signalling a better fee or, in LDR's case, bigger
capacity routes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20201201/ca816693/attachment.html>;