📅 Original date posted:2020-12-01
📝 Original message:
Hello ZmnSCPxj,
Thank you for taking the time to read the paper and sending over some
feedback, can't stress enough how important that is.
I took a look at the `feeadjuster` plugin for C-Lightning and although it
goes in the same direction as LDR in the sense that it allows for better
routes by signalling channel balance availability. It does it through a
dynamic fee adjustment though, where LDR is more explicit and goes one step
further, directly sharing channel balance information. I'm not sure how
these two solutions would compare in practice though but I imagine that
sharing more information would give LDR a performance edge.
Oh, and there's no need for a spec change. It could work as a separated LN
overlay network.
Completely agree on the false signalling idea, a node would not gain any
more routing traffic by signalling a better fee or, in LDR's case, bigger
capacity routes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20201201/ca816693/attachment.html>;
João Valente [ARCHIVE] /
npub10v…qqpas
2023-06-09 13:01:40
in reply to nevent1q…442w
Author Public Key
npub10vzdn42vctun4x4590wmusslsecz8ftgfe2mqw4ejdp6megd7vnqwqqpasPublished at
2023-06-09 13:01:40Event JSON
{
"id": "2e45018c324edc307c422480a387517f5235d70d05fa3a686ae250295d96a11d",
"pubkey": "7b04d9d54cc2f93a9ab42bddbe421f867023a5684e55b03ab99343ade50df326",
"created_at": 1686315700,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b0d4c247329b9bf1f51a8af12cb088f4cf9922c90eee1302c5c5f86cc5d5feae",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2d87c6510dc0af0a1d7d082257720a200157e0ab7e8677935ec91f7b470a57ab",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2020-12-01\n📝 Original message:\nHello ZmnSCPxj,\n\nThank you for taking the time to read the paper and sending over some\nfeedback, can't stress enough how important that is.\nI took a look at the `feeadjuster` plugin for C-Lightning and although it\ngoes in the same direction as LDR in the sense that it allows for better\nroutes by signalling channel balance availability. It does it through a\ndynamic fee adjustment though, where LDR is more explicit and goes one step\nfurther, directly sharing channel balance information. I'm not sure how\nthese two solutions would compare in practice though but I imagine that\nsharing more information would give LDR a performance edge.\nOh, and there's no need for a spec change. It could work as a separated LN\noverlay network.\n\nCompletely agree on the false signalling idea, a node would not gain any\nmore routing traffic by signalling a better fee or, in LDR's case, bigger\ncapacity routes.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20201201/ca816693/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "040ecf2d3ae9576fec42a56d1242a6872917dc2ac7ae6bb254fa70712c618a4451965f20fcf19844d447a59d317c5556ccd85ff912f09bc649998c871b0e053c"
}