📅 Original date posted:2014-10-19
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 10:29:43 AM Wladimir wrote:
> B) I also think it makes sense to move the BIP discussion (both about
> the BIP process and individual BIPs) to a separate mailing list.
>
> bitcoin-development currently has a dual function: discussion of
> Bitcoin Core implementation concerns, as well as global changes to
> Bitcoin (in the form of BIPs).
>
> This makes the list too busy for some people, but it is critical that
> everyone writing a Bitcoin node or client is up-to-date with proposals
> and can comment on them.
I joined the list when Bitcoin was already in the 10-billions of market
capitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is here
given the importance of Bitcoin.
So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was
allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting the
list up won't help with that.
Greetings
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141019/3bafc443/attachment.sig>;
xor [ARCHIVE] /
npub14a…g6tv3
2023-06-07 15:26:32
in reply to nevent1q…upaf
Author Public Key
npub14a7v3r4ppfy007s0tk2h0ujh38h9x4t6jyrndev9qmmazd2vrsvqxg6tv3Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:26:32Event JSON
{
"id": "258a8db0390dfefab701f8b4c860d9f5f007d818ea781aa55f1786b1b3b3d191",
"pubkey": "af7cc88ea10a48f7fa0f5d9577f25789ee53557a910736e58506f7d1354c1c18",
"created_at": 1686151592,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8e8ffc86b671332d74dc30a93d73d86bf0648414fedbd225ac787a9a2713f3b5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"5affa92cdfa91ef090427d6fa581f9268b9c06676096f0da3204230c29d98627",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-10-19\n📝 Original message:On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 10:29:43 AM Wladimir wrote:\n\u003e B) I also think it makes sense to move the BIP discussion (both about\n\u003e the BIP process and individual BIPs) to a separate mailing list.\n\u003e \n\u003e bitcoin-development currently has a dual function: discussion of\n\u003e Bitcoin Core implementation concerns, as well as global changes to\n\u003e Bitcoin (in the form of BIPs).\n\u003e \n\u003e This makes the list too busy for some people, but it is critical that\n\u003e everyone writing a Bitcoin node or client is up-to-date with proposals\n\u003e and can comment on them.\n\nI joined the list when Bitcoin was already in the 10-billions of market \ncapitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is here \ngiven the importance of Bitcoin.\n\nSo as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was \nallowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting the \nlist up won't help with that.\n\nGreetings\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 836 bytes\nDesc: This is a digitally signed message part.\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20141019/3bafc443/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "9af7282fc6d44a3be0e983eedaa21ae845b5c60cdc2a2e58122bc02167f10af8bf9f0f6676e59c012dc29faed045fe2d60d9b40c284d08aa5842e88e82dbcaf7"
}