📅 Original date posted:2018-12-18
📝 Original message:On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:16 PM Johnson Lau <jl2012 at xbt.hk> wrote:
>
> I proposed the same in BIP114. I wish Satoshi had designed that way.
>
Thanks. I probably read that and internalized it and forgot you wrote it.
> But I’m not sure if that would do more harm than good. For example, people
> might lose money by copying an existing script template. But they might
> also lose money in the same way as CHECKMULTISIG is disabled. So I’m not
> sure.
>
> Another related thing I’d like to bikeshed is to pop the stack after
> OP_CLTV and OP_CSV. The same pros and cons apply.
>
This one is almost a no-brainer I think. Nearly every instance of OP_CSV
is followed by an OP_DROP and we'd save 1 WU per OP_CSV if we pop the stack
afterwards.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20181217/8d9e5536/attachment-0001.html>;
Russell O'Connor [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dw…8plrw
2023-06-07 18:15:50
in reply to nevent1q…vf6s
Author Public Key
npub1dw88wd5gqsqn6ufxhf9h03uk8087l7gfzdtez5csjlt6pupu4pwsj8plrwPublished at
2023-06-07 18:15:50Event JSON
{
"id": "219ee157520f6d93e14065e29340b8f49383459cca24be577a9ea4d96e32db70",
"pubkey": "6b8e77368804013d7126ba4b77c7963bcfeff909135791531097d7a0f03ca85d",
"created_at": 1686161750,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"95a7666d06270aa9f58810567e7ac7b8253aa77a17d25b8084eefbabf6d565ec",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2e635d46d9dfd27808cd739d04935919b76d58dd72bf93443206d81f392851a7",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"492fa402e838904bdc8eb2c8fafa1aa895df26438bfd998c71b01cb9db550ff7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-12-18\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:16 PM Johnson Lau \u003cjl2012 at xbt.hk\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e I proposed the same in BIP114. I wish Satoshi had designed that way.\n\u003e\n\nThanks. I probably read that and internalized it and forgot you wrote it.\n\n\n\u003e But I’m not sure if that would do more harm than good. For example, people\n\u003e might lose money by copying an existing script template. But they might\n\u003e also lose money in the same way as CHECKMULTISIG is disabled. So I’m not\n\u003e sure.\n\u003e\n\u003e Another related thing I’d like to bikeshed is to pop the stack after\n\u003e OP_CLTV and OP_CSV. The same pros and cons apply.\n\u003e\n\nThis one is almost a no-brainer I think. Nearly every instance of OP_CSV\nis followed by an OP_DROP and we'd save 1 WU per OP_CSV if we pop the stack\nafterwards.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20181217/8d9e5536/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "e01aa43b1de6bbb17baa418a258b848793705386d9f17ac3fa2259858bfa43dbb448f048ff2e48f67ee81186a592fe6442a24b748e2e38dd0b4e7249fb77c1f5"
}