📅 Original date posted:2017-01-25
📝 Original message:Den 25 jan. 2017 08:22 skrev "Johnson Lau" <jl2012 at xbt.hk>:
Assuming Alice is paying Bob with an old style time-locked tx. Under your
proposal, after the hardfork, Bob is still able to confirm the time-locked
tx on both networks. To fulfil your new rules he just needs to send the
outputs to himself again (with different tx format). But as Bob gets all
the money on both forks, it is already a successful replay
Why would Alice be sitting on an old-style signed transaction with UTXO:s
none of which she controls (paying somebody else), with NO ability to
substitute the transaction for one where she DOES control an output,
leaving her unable to be the one spending the replay protecting child
transaction?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170125/3a1d6361/attachment.html>;
Natanael [ARCHIVE] /
npub179…lpmjt
2023-06-07 17:55:39
in reply to nevent1q…zjuu
Author Public Key
npub1798ncudyucap9jzzujjsgufx8tdykm8auzfledjcs6f6wf4ekqvq8lpmjtPublished at
2023-06-07 17:55:39Event JSON
{
"id": "20eca86c0fa19934fe1052df006b6fbd30de7d3981965b95294ef478798a209a",
"pubkey": "f14f3c71a4e63a12c842e4a50471263ada4b6cfde093fcb6588693a726b9b018",
"created_at": 1686160539,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"08564427a86ede87bab23151dbcfb043a11ce80299dd31e312bfe1aa29950657",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8f21ae18839c042ee570ffcdcdf40a992b8b62e043ea15be7452623ffb6ff18f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"492fa402e838904bdc8eb2c8fafa1aa895df26438bfd998c71b01cb9db550ff7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-01-25\n📝 Original message:Den 25 jan. 2017 08:22 skrev \"Johnson Lau\" \u003cjl2012 at xbt.hk\u003e:\n\nAssuming Alice is paying Bob with an old style time-locked tx. Under your\nproposal, after the hardfork, Bob is still able to confirm the time-locked\ntx on both networks. To fulfil your new rules he just needs to send the\noutputs to himself again (with different tx format). But as Bob gets all\nthe money on both forks, it is already a successful replay\n\n\nWhy would Alice be sitting on an old-style signed transaction with UTXO:s\nnone of which she controls (paying somebody else), with NO ability to\nsubstitute the transaction for one where she DOES control an output,\nleaving her unable to be the one spending the replay protecting child\ntransaction?\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170125/3a1d6361/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "4eb8c56f420b4b7de5564f5e7e6b4b109b4c21363946eadae08787fafd8f67a45a243e7127f8ff7ec378ce3c21e907f8d3ce5ef2f58179881443dd8a68caf4f9"
}