📅 Original date posted:2015-08-18
📝 Original message:At
http://media.scmagazine.com/documents/127/virtual_currency_rules_31557.pdf,
section 200.3(c)(2) lists "consumers that utilize Virtual Currency solely
for the purchase or sale of goods or services or for investment purposes"
as "Persons [who] are exempt from the licensing requirements".
Who else is left?
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Theo Chino via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I might have a "crazy" simple solution.
> From the literature I read, it seems that Satochi has the keys that would
> authenticate him using Bitcoin.
>
> HBO John Oliver's program might have given me (and hopefully others) the
> brilliant idea to protect the Bitcoin network from the overzealous reach of
> the politicians. One need to start a Church, and to start the Church one
> need funds (121UZ1hDs9MgCHonA8vjXr89D8FuDf5c7t) to start.
>
> John Oliver's program on HBO about Churches (and the hypocrisy of some)
> was epic and such entity could argue that Bitcoin is a belief system (which
> it is) and would force the issue at a Federal level under the Church and
> State separation. - John's video :
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y1xJAVZxXg
>
> At this time, I am waiting for the License issue to walk its course in New
> York State.
>
> Currently:
>
> - I am waiting for my License to be denied (to protest) and appeal it.
> - Waiting to hear from the License process to appeal the law in
> general.
> - Meeting Elected officials (in New York City, NY State, and France)
> and educating them on Bitcoin.
>
> Every time we (the community) talk about Bitcoin, it can sound like
> religion; therefore why not go all the way and do what John Oliver did ?
> Seed money would help. :)
>
> Regarding the Fork, from my perspective of a small company, I see that
> like it was with IRC with the ICMP node split. The Church thing is not here
> to take side but to "try" to protect the Bitcoin.
>
> We will need to ordain ministers selected after completing prescribed
> courses of study setup by the developers.
>
> In short I am asking Satochi to help this church with original coins. If
> it is a troll, I am talking to the Dev Community at large to recruit them
> to ordain the ministers.
>
> Regards,
> *Theo Chino*
>
>
> *https://www.facebook.com/groups/557495624389384
> <https://www.facebook.com/groups/557495624389384>; (NY
> State)http://frenchmorning.com/en/2014/08/18/french-robin-hood-bitcoin-new-york
> <http://frenchmorning.com/en/2014/08/18/french-robin-hood-bitcoin-new-york>;*
>
> *(My position on the fork is still the same as when I ran for a seat of
> the Foundation; still don't have enough information and thing will move
> faster than I can devote the time to read about it.)*
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> For the record I would like to share my technical analysis of the Satoshi
>> email which I wrote in a pastebin (http://pastebin.com/Ct5M8fa2) a few
>> days ago.
>>
>> 1. The email is the one used by Satoshi to announce Bitcoin in the first
>> place.
>> http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-October/014810.html
>>
>> 2. The email was not spoofed, it actually originated from vistomail's
>> server. The email headers show the email originated from 190.97.163.93
>> and the SPF records show this as an authorised sender for the email.
>> This does not prove the account wasn't hacked of course, or that the
>> account might have expired and be re-registered by someone else (vistomail
>> is a paid for email provider).
>>
>> 3. While the email is not signed, and there are a number of PGP keys
>> listed on key servers for him (to vary addresses), he didnt sign any emails
>> with any PGP keys.
>>
>> It is therefore not possible to outright dismiss the email's authenticity
>> as the email originates from an authentic source. The only questions is
>> whether the webmail service was hacked or commandeered somehow.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--
I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a
techie?
I own Litmocracy <http://www.litmocracy.com>; and Meme Racing
<http://www.memeracing.net>; (in alpha).
I'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist <http://www.voluntaryist.com>; which
now accepts Bitcoin.
I also code for The Dollar Vigilante <http://dollarvigilante.com/>;.
"He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satoshi
Nakamoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150817/bd738711/attachment.html>;
Dave Scotese [ARCHIVE] /
npub15w…maru8
2023-06-07 15:47:29
in reply to nevent1q…ts3j
Author Public Key
npub15wz8j5cse6sexlw6f5q7arc5efe5hxn6kcxxyy222et8qms4u3lsemaru8Published at
2023-06-07 15:47:29Event JSON
{
"id": "2ddf368339608655871c4ae2b29706b919863ba9010c2ce541090d2327a474ed",
"pubkey": "a384795310cea1937dda4d01ee8f14ca734b9a7ab60c62114a5656706e15e47f",
"created_at": 1686152849,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c2ea875b0594d5635a2a5ab9721c10059f40c62d11975dcc679e649aa5cf3f34",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"89070dee824a8117ab9fedc47fd54c3e6a2bd741ac9c1761cf294168c3f33d50",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"817db254d1c585caa35208eafc034004dfba882260c7c0c1f1555321dcf59a95"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-18\n📝 Original message:At\nhttp://media.scmagazine.com/documents/127/virtual_currency_rules_31557.pdf,\nsection 200.3(c)(2) lists \"consumers that utilize Virtual Currency solely\nfor the purchase or sale of goods or services or for investment purposes\"\nas \"Persons [who] are exempt from the licensing requirements\".\n\nWho else is left?\n\n\n\n\nOn Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Theo Chino via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Hello,\n\u003e\n\u003e I might have a \"crazy\" simple solution.\n\u003e From the literature I read, it seems that Satochi has the keys that would\n\u003e authenticate him using Bitcoin.\n\u003e\n\u003e HBO John Oliver's program might have given me (and hopefully others) the\n\u003e brilliant idea to protect the Bitcoin network from the overzealous reach of\n\u003e the politicians. One need to start a Church, and to start the Church one\n\u003e need funds (121UZ1hDs9MgCHonA8vjXr89D8FuDf5c7t) to start.\n\u003e\n\u003e John Oliver's program on HBO about Churches (and the hypocrisy of some)\n\u003e was epic and such entity could argue that Bitcoin is a belief system (which\n\u003e it is) and would force the issue at a Federal level under the Church and\n\u003e State separation. - John's video :\n\u003e https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y1xJAVZxXg\n\u003e\n\u003e At this time, I am waiting for the License issue to walk its course in New\n\u003e York State.\n\u003e\n\u003e Currently:\n\u003e\n\u003e - I am waiting for my License to be denied (to protest) and appeal it.\n\u003e - Waiting to hear from the License process to appeal the law in\n\u003e general.\n\u003e - Meeting Elected officials (in New York City, NY State, and France)\n\u003e and educating them on Bitcoin.\n\u003e\n\u003e Every time we (the community) talk about Bitcoin, it can sound like\n\u003e religion; therefore why not go all the way and do what John Oliver did ?\n\u003e Seed money would help. :)\n\u003e\n\u003e Regarding the Fork, from my perspective of a small company, I see that\n\u003e like it was with IRC with the ICMP node split. The Church thing is not here\n\u003e to take side but to \"try\" to protect the Bitcoin.\n\u003e\n\u003e We will need to ordain ministers selected after completing prescribed\n\u003e courses of study setup by the developers.\n\u003e\n\u003e In short I am asking Satochi to help this church with original coins. If\n\u003e it is a troll, I am talking to the Dev Community at large to recruit them\n\u003e to ordain the ministers.\n\u003e\n\u003e Regards,\n\u003e *Theo Chino*\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e *https://www.facebook.com/groups/557495624389384\n\u003e \u003chttps://www.facebook.com/groups/557495624389384\u003e (NY\n\u003e State)http://frenchmorning.com/en/2014/08/18/french-robin-hood-bitcoin-new-york\n\u003e \u003chttp://frenchmorning.com/en/2014/08/18/french-robin-hood-bitcoin-new-york\u003e*\n\u003e\n\u003e *(My position on the fork is still the same as when I ran for a seat of\n\u003e the Foundation; still don't have enough information and thing will move\n\u003e faster than I can devote the time to read about it.)*\n\u003e\n\u003e On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e For the record I would like to share my technical analysis of the Satoshi\n\u003e\u003e email which I wrote in a pastebin (http://pastebin.com/Ct5M8fa2) a few\n\u003e\u003e days ago.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e 1. The email is the one used by Satoshi to announce Bitcoin in the first\n\u003e\u003e place.\n\u003e\u003e http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-October/014810.html\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e 2. The email was not spoofed, it actually originated from vistomail's\n\u003e\u003e server. The email headers show the email originated from 190.97.163.93\n\u003e\u003e and the SPF records show this as an authorised sender for the email.\n\u003e\u003e This does not prove the account wasn't hacked of course, or that the\n\u003e\u003e account might have expired and be re-registered by someone else (vistomail\n\u003e\u003e is a paid for email provider).\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e 3. While the email is not signed, and there are a number of PGP keys\n\u003e\u003e listed on key servers for him (to vary addresses), he didnt sign any emails\n\u003e\u003e with any PGP keys.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e It is therefore not possible to outright dismiss the email's authenticity\n\u003e\u003e as the email originates from an authentic source. The only questions is\n\u003e\u003e whether the webmail service was hacked or commandeered somehow.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\n\n-- \nI like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a\ntechie?\nI own Litmocracy \u003chttp://www.litmocracy.com\u003e and Meme Racing\n\u003chttp://www.memeracing.net\u003e (in alpha).\nI'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist \u003chttp://www.voluntaryist.com\u003e which\nnow accepts Bitcoin.\nI also code for The Dollar Vigilante \u003chttp://dollarvigilante.com/\u003e.\n\"He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules\" - Satoshi\nNakamoto\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150817/bd738711/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "c2af3bfd69c8c99eeae43af884e4c48a95cec94cf9c6df6c634ae6ee604ef149b578e1ebf95671da441c1d0042c99015e9005c6180c43f346183377bb18f591e"
}