📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19
📝 Original message:I am indifferent on this issue (the bit inversion), but so far only Jorge
has spoken up. I opted for this detail during implementation in order to
preserve existing semantics, even if those semantics are not commonly used.
This was the conservative choice, driven in part because I didn't want the
proposal to be held up by the other side saying "this is confusing because
it changes how sequence numbers work! it used to count up but now it counts
down!"
I can see both sides and as I said I'm indifferent, so I went with the
conservative choice of not messing with existing semantics. However if
there is strong preferences from _multiple_ people on this matter it is not
too late to change. If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge Timón <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I repeated my nit on https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Please note there is now a PR for this BIP[1] and also a pull request for
> > the opcode CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY in Bitcoin Core[2].
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179
> > [2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150819/fb556776/attachment-0001.html>;
Mark Friedenbach [ARCHIVE] /
npub1r3…48d0u
2023-06-07 17:34:57
in reply to nevent1q…9mzj
Author Public Key
npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0uPublished at
2023-06-07 17:34:57Event JSON
{
"id": "2f8f6aa59e409d8c4de9902af5c87c9d600a7753eddf81c8524d18529a80cbc9",
"pubkey": "1c61d995949cbfaf14f767784e166bde865c7b8783d7aa3bf0a1d014b70c0069",
"created_at": 1686159297,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"41b744fb00dece0ad755afb2bd169d7e5d2189a91240037a08b3b215596a998e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3f80b9d3a56ed5d24d0bda42dc9b626cadf9a34f13b74339a3d8e832a7ed1d80",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19\n📝 Original message:I am indifferent on this issue (the bit inversion), but so far only Jorge\nhas spoken up. I opted for this detail during implementation in order to\npreserve existing semantics, even if those semantics are not commonly used.\nThis was the conservative choice, driven in part because I didn't want the\nproposal to be held up by the other side saying \"this is confusing because\nit changes how sequence numbers work! it used to count up but now it counts\ndown!\"\n\nI can see both sides and as I said I'm indifferent, so I went with the\nconservative choice of not messing with existing semantics. However if\nthere is strong preferences from _multiple_ people on this matter it is not\ntoo late to change. If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.\n\nOn Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge Timón \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e I repeated my nit on https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Please note there is now a PR for this BIP[1] and also a pull request for\n\u003e \u003e the opcode CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY in Bitcoin Core[2].\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e [1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179\n\u003e \u003e [2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e \u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e \u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e \u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150819/fb556776/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "a43caa8250e7818fc71b20310b9516141f46e45f29b1710c232ff48b02b7e54b9349d039527979f65d717c2936848d7dcb8408809d5472e2364786780b6c7a2c"
}