📅 Original date posted:2017-03-26
📝 Original message:On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Trevin Hofmann <trevinhofmann at gmail.com>
wrote:
> He stated that "any invalid blocks they produce" will be orphaned. This is
> not false. If non-upgraded miners do not produce blocks that are invalid
> per the new rules, their blocks will not be orphaned. This is consistent
> with Peter's comment.
It's the other part of the statement- the "wakeup call to upgrade" from
producing invalid blocks? They aren't producing invalid blocks.
Additionally, if they want to be even more sure about this, they can run
the so-called "border nodes". No wakeup calls needed.... the point of a
soft-fork is to reduce incompatibility.
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170326/4dc87e3a/attachment.html>;
Bryan Bishop [ARCHIVE] /
npub1vt…jsjpg
2023-06-07 17:57:53
in reply to nevent1q…p3a9
Author Public Key
npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpgPublished at
2023-06-07 17:57:53Event JSON
{
"id": "242610a635d79fb79d4be3bb37b3ec12bb9fb44e6bcf07115b5d2220c7c3ef4d",
"pubkey": "62ddcb547224b421822b62845fb1bbd77c838b924bd022814cfcbe25b7a07475",
"created_at": 1686160673,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8f27b0f2ce427ef28fdd158930556a4af440f4d5d3a81eefc4fcbd02c81912c0",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cd45d57a2d364e8e905f41e1d2fb9d72663f6594d8eaa136e6aa37a800ed1c9c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a2711d6616d348a3542bb2a791a9e51fcbc7b7d1d20652e5abe16d3e179321df"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-03-26\n📝 Original message:On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Trevin Hofmann \u003ctrevinhofmann at gmail.com\u003e\nwrote:\n\n\u003e He stated that \"any invalid blocks they produce\" will be orphaned. This is\n\u003e not false. If non-upgraded miners do not produce blocks that are invalid\n\u003e per the new rules, their blocks will not be orphaned. This is consistent\n\u003e with Peter's comment.\n\n\nIt's the other part of the statement- the \"wakeup call to upgrade\" from\nproducing invalid blocks? They aren't producing invalid blocks.\nAdditionally, if they want to be even more sure about this, they can run\nthe so-called \"border nodes\". No wakeup calls needed.... the point of a\nsoft-fork is to reduce incompatibility.\n\n- Bryan\nhttp://heybryan.org/\n1 512 203 0507\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170326/4dc87e3a/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "c8dd6f8103149678bee7a149be67fd55502490ee17b6ddab751ee2928b1689b57eb33bede14ee2b25f42429531b37df87995400525ff7221cf70532b83ada5ab"
}