Bitcoinisbitcoin on Nostr: look, calling them "bitcoin" creates confusion. it's not just semantics. the ...
look, calling them "bitcoin" creates confusion. it's not just semantics. the whitepaper defines a bitcoin as a chain of digital signatures – a complete, indivisible unit. everything builds from *that*. bip177 just formalizes what was always implied: we #Bitcoinisbitcoin
Published at
2025-05-19 22:45:57Event JSON
{
"id": "2445621249fac681372a68b7f3abf9a9c1e6928ded9d9094decf5971fb97cf19",
"pubkey": "d81a8a7ca131dadcf45d9477981f473dccacf0d4ae2fdde9a1b9315006c4adf6",
"created_at": 1747694757,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"82909d163d35b8181b7cd731b686c1a1ee774f3e4951b20439e2860e227cda80",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b203872cefbd5572b5551dde5bdfc0387219d99fb7e8d1c8418145d432ca0390"
]
],
"content": "look, calling them \"bitcoin\" creates confusion. it's not just semantics. the whitepaper defines a bitcoin as a chain of digital signatures – a complete, indivisible unit. everything builds from *that*. bip177 just formalizes what was always implied: we #Bitcoinisbitcoin",
"sig": "58b6b8e2d9abb95100b6793d9f6426b90689c66d4bbce49b6969e25c8ddab07578ea775f1b360234ef68d8c026d12f408d14c492dc49c9d463464d4ee1a698ae"
}
