📅 Original date posted:2018-10-04
📝 Original message:
Ha! I actually came up with the idea two months ago (but you beat me
to it on the implementation so we're even :-)
https://github.com/ACINQ/eclair-wallet/issues/101#issuecomment-408619207
Le jeu. 20 sept. 2018 à 04:12, Rusty Russell <rusty at blockstream.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm considering a change to c-lightning, where `invoice` would
> automatically append an 'r' field for a channel which has sufficient
> *incoming* capacity for the amount (using a weighted probability across
> our peers).
>
> This isn't quite what 'r' was for, but it would be a useful
> hint for payment routing and also potentially for establishing an
> initial channel. This is an issue for the Blockstream Store which
> deliberately doesn't advertize an address any more to avoid
> centralization.
>
> Thoughts welcome!
> Rusty.
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
Pierre [ARCHIVE] /
npub1yz…y4pdt
2023-06-09 12:51:32
in reply to nevent1q…crzf
Author Public Key
npub1yz88535e0ydqye9q9x8l5cz9d3g6ervfjgyk5xm88zvktmxvstlsuy4pdtPublished at
2023-06-09 12:51:32Event JSON
{
"id": "24edc90326be7851c72acc598b9ca350fca7f77d43fafca37cd37bf1a075b8d6",
"pubkey": "208e7a4699791a0264a0298ffa60456c51ac8d8992096a1b67389965eccc82ff",
"created_at": 1686315092,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"34f972ce1f660f3d3f1ba8a09ccfbd7c4d82ba2dba504bf244e97255e67fae9d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9456f7acb763eaab2e02bd8e60cf17df74f352c2ae579dce1f1dd25c95dd611c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-10-04\n📝 Original message:\nHa! I actually came up with the idea two months ago (but you beat me\nto it on the implementation so we're even :-)\n\nhttps://github.com/ACINQ/eclair-wallet/issues/101#issuecomment-408619207\n\n\nLe jeu. 20 sept. 2018 à 04:12, Rusty Russell \u003crusty at blockstream.com\u003e a écrit :\n\u003e\n\u003e Hi all,\n\u003e\n\u003e I'm considering a change to c-lightning, where `invoice` would\n\u003e automatically append an 'r' field for a channel which has sufficient\n\u003e *incoming* capacity for the amount (using a weighted probability across\n\u003e our peers).\n\u003e\n\u003e This isn't quite what 'r' was for, but it would be a useful\n\u003e hint for payment routing and also potentially for establishing an\n\u003e initial channel. This is an issue for the Blockstream Store which\n\u003e deliberately doesn't advertize an address any more to avoid\n\u003e centralization.\n\u003e\n\u003e Thoughts welcome!\n\u003e Rusty.\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Lightning-dev mailing list\n\u003e Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev",
"sig": "34e075d1100b877a260dadc4605b5231aaa28f90f94e646de691eb89f4387d1405f58eb6b8a06f2fab2625080f8e68af026e0ba1af879ce708a7f7278fa2db33"
}