📅 Original date posted:2015-06-26
📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Will <will.madden at novauri.com> wrote:
> Make the lazy miners' default choice grow at the hard cap growth rate and
> you should be ok if you want voting.
I think the default block size is an orthogonal issue to the max block size.
HOWEVER: I think changing the default 'target' block size from the current,
fixed 750K to the average of the size of the last N blocks would have some
nice properties. It is policy-neutral (we should get out of the business of
deciding the right block size and let the miners who care drive block size
up or down) and if there are a significant proportion of lazy miners going
with defaults it gives the system a healthy "fee pressure."
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150626/03235a77/attachment.html>;
Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s4…d44kw
2023-06-07 15:39:53
in reply to nevent1q…rmun
Author Public Key
npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwPublished at
2023-06-07 15:39:53Event JSON
{
"id": "2c94db09f982dd14c9688ac11a09e67d2b15f0de4461790ebcb74ddaa5c8c7b2",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686152393,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1936c15d372dc9e8a0eaf645dcff207375e90675dbebfadcf82370abc654737d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"79cbd75af8a6ecaa69f1131a8f3078d651461a3a71cc2a545b530f949a5609c5",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"366b04144886caf61d1988df75165b74b9c6e3ed325d8177a2e06f4251ea7c98"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-26\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Will \u003cwill.madden at novauri.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Make the lazy miners' default choice grow at the hard cap growth rate and\n\u003e you should be ok if you want voting.\n\n\nI think the default block size is an orthogonal issue to the max block size.\n\nHOWEVER: I think changing the default 'target' block size from the current,\nfixed 750K to the average of the size of the last N blocks would have some\nnice properties. It is policy-neutral (we should get out of the business of\ndeciding the right block size and let the miners who care drive block size\nup or down) and if there are a significant proportion of lazy miners going\nwith defaults it gives the system a healthy \"fee pressure.\"\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150626/03235a77/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "eac9705cf6e15f7d410a92e6186de28524009eca22c3e959c73a3790f4d2497957e28ef6c4364dfa094566c58b9b8fdfa7f992483740b59beac842b6a553aa93"
}