info at bitmarkets.net [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-09 📝 Original message:Hello all, one argument I ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-09
📝 Original message:Hello all,
one argument I often read on this mailing list is that it's essential to
reward miners with transaction fees at some point to secure the network.
Off-chain transactions, whether it's Lightning or something else,
potentially extract fees, which may otherwise be paid to miners, if the
transactions were actually on-chain.
In this context, wouldn't it be contradictory, maybe even harmful, to
aim for an environment, where some/many/most transactions are off-chain?
I have not yet seen this conflict addressed in the recent discussions.
Published at
2023-06-07 15:46:31Event JSON
{
"id": "26dba8776261422bbd813b89207717529ed822769eeb58443c137e9ee41946c9",
"pubkey": "ecb3a6780143f2eff3b86f9363b99d785234ae7ffad589ea4faaa77ae4f4de2b",
"created_at": 1686152791,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"41b51823afdaa24b72f4ee2d7a4a92c67b0a681c7bc2f157674aec4c3d3f0b15",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-09\n📝 Original message:Hello all,\n\none argument I often read on this mailing list is that it's essential to\nreward miners with transaction fees at some point to secure the network.\n\nOff-chain transactions, whether it's Lightning or something else,\npotentially extract fees, which may otherwise be paid to miners, if the\ntransactions were actually on-chain.\n\nIn this context, wouldn't it be contradictory, maybe even harmful, to\naim for an environment, where some/many/most transactions are off-chain?\n\nI have not yet seen this conflict addressed in the recent discussions.",
"sig": "10b1f73ef4c9c9a042b06052dc2a8e48218c17bb44ddc93a535d5831cbc9020aff6ba340e5e1da1899fbb1477b63345170c69d986c4c0e1e79cf5037fda28b91"
}