📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23
📝 Original message:On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille at gmail.com> wrote:
> In that case, maybe it makes sense to define another purpose id
> without accounts as well already.
>
> I believe many simple wallets will find multiple subwallets too
> burdening for the user experience, or not worth the technical
> complexity.
Or implement them but in a form where the different wallets can have
different security policies and thus wouldn't share a common piece of
private key material. I can see it being pretty confusing to have
multiple wallets which are both sharing a private key and not sharing
a private key.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 15:18:00
in reply to nevent1q…r6a5
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 15:18:00Event JSON
{
"id": "26c492372063f67743734fdeed1345b4ef1e07b26dbc80507e4c3fd2da0207df",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686151080,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3d6a81230db6ab232d8356d3ea7e609f18aff1b8f11502ea70755e81b0de88f9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c13c43286be41c61c9950b1156b2c8288df6b54d66e984f3ae5b3f00b174be20",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7631397e469f47f3535567311f5f7c17129e0ff2cb253df015e3d92ddfd92c63"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Pieter Wuille \u003cpieter.wuille at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e In that case, maybe it makes sense to define another purpose id\n\u003e without accounts as well already.\n\u003e\n\u003e I believe many simple wallets will find multiple subwallets too\n\u003e burdening for the user experience, or not worth the technical\n\u003e complexity.\n\nOr implement them but in a form where the different wallets can have\ndifferent security policies and thus wouldn't share a common piece of\nprivate key material. I can see it being pretty confusing to have\nmultiple wallets which are both sharing a private key and not sharing\na private key.",
"sig": "8c0ab3c9ab82c9f188ba948e78e214cd3120eec3b043412d6e73668b2a523375f4b80377489a3860b7d5bacdc82b728e0de6dfef13cabf5cf39b07aa3a7be481"
}