đ
Original date posted:2015-06-27
đ Original message:>That requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing
the whole community.
I'll take that as a "no". But it's a strange bar to set: perfect
representation of entire community. By that token, nobody can say anything
is controversial if a different group is disagreeing.
Greg
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:25 AM, NxtChg <nxtchg at hush.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/27/2015 at 3:18 PM, "Greg Sanders" <gsanders87 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial hard fork?
>
> That requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing
> the whole community.
>
> And no shady lobbying behind the scenes too.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/a57d0719/attachment.html>;
Greg Sanders [ARCHIVE] /
npub1jdâŚ3gh0m
2023-06-07 15:40:44
in reply to nevent1qâŚ9r7d
Author Public Key
npub1jdl3plz00rvxwc6g2ckemzrgg0amx5wen4kfvs3laxtssxvk9cvsf3gh0mPublished at
2023-06-07 15:40:44Event JSON
{
"id": "2c293e59de87dfa4b21f707e0db09cd3eac9e9a730389a3661504d2121e72bbf",
"pubkey": "937f10fc4f78d8676348562d9d886843fbb351d99d6c96423fe9970819962e19",
"created_at": 1686152444,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b97b8772e4c3c0f5eb751746063b4217197a3eb7cab2fa3b16264082ad573c4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c09369a9ae83676293928ce6aedbef5d38703e9b4b9df250854c3264dc9d64c1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"238bb115101f2c05433c2b8aefc80ed5b4af9d3ff844748859d7a2298b116b49"
]
],
"content": "đ
Original date posted:2015-06-27\nđ Original message:\u003eThat requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing\nthe whole community.\n\nI'll take that as a \"no\". But it's a strange bar to set: perfect\nrepresentation of entire community. By that token, nobody can say anything\nis controversial if a different group is disagreeing.\n\nGreg\n\nOn Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:25 AM, NxtChg \u003cnxtchg at hush.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e On 6/27/2015 at 3:18 PM, \"Greg Sanders\" \u003cgsanders87 at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003eCan we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial hard fork?\n\u003e\n\u003e That requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing\n\u003e the whole community.\n\u003e\n\u003e And no shady lobbying behind the scenes too.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/a57d0719/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "4167cdf7928e47b1fb8f82d98148c8d1a9065f75320ba07ac27d4e44f1bc482afe3944972b9ba5094ba701cbeacf26db6f0dda2d176a9e1ea8f02586bf372f7a"
}