📅 Original date posted:2015-05-12
📝 Original message:I have no strong opinion, but a slight preference for separate opcodes.
Reason: given the current progress, they'll likely be deployed
independently, and maybe the end result is not something that cleanly fits
the current CLTV argument structure.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150512/4bfcc543/attachment.html>;
Pieter Wuille [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tj…jtl6r
2023-06-07 15:32:58
in reply to nevent1q…04qx
Author Public Key
npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6rPublished at
2023-06-07 15:32:58Event JSON
{
"id": "2ecebe67f21545c423cf621caad3603d095390c19e3fbe73150b09fa8929a1e4",
"pubkey": "5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6",
"created_at": 1686151978,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2451731e34fd8c6019315925db922355d3ab00776b9fd338f1281023cb9d1914",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f353c39149e75973ad7f0c40375cebcd97a50ea36d7c4bf6b5bc42931c93555c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-05-12\n📝 Original message:I have no strong opinion, but a slight preference for separate opcodes.\n\nReason: given the current progress, they'll likely be deployed\nindependently, and maybe the end result is not something that cleanly fits\nthe current CLTV argument structure.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150512/4bfcc543/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "c0e613fe2a7a6d2570ae88a1f862c6221f20ec862c56a7ef4ee0364f48c53b58991d0869f4b481ad8910d8d4497c6927893fd286bb7b7a3d479be73cfa61a685"
}