Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-22 📝 Original message:> On Jul 22, 2015, at 5:27 ...
đź“… Original date posted:2015-07-22
📝 Original message:> On Jul 22, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/22/2015 9:52 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> It would be irresponsible and dangerous to the network and thus the users of the software to risk forks, or to take a leading role in pushing dramatic changes.
>
> Count me among those who see allowing bitcoin to become space-constrained, without technical reason, as a dramatic change. Especially when the reasons cited in support are
>
> - Various species of vaporware
> - Amateurish economic thinking surrounding fees
> - "We don't support it because not everyone supports it because we don't support it because ..." infinite descent
>
I take it you mean allowing bitcoin to *not* become space-constrained - because all real-world computers are space-constrained…
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150722/6e8520af/attachment.sig>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:43:05Event JSON
{
"id": "23922fb50f9dcabf059044a8d8b4dbb12777dd7dea9a92ef4c79040ce2fe4fc6",
"pubkey": "e899768d254f3537af7e26455968583632d0ab0bd4c780445eacfa087ac80d8f",
"created_at": 1686152585,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"95a36d78d6bf18f4b8ede735f044f5cc9630ae9f0b1198d008835777ff84eede",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"081085a45765995c77de0d926d12c0ea14a428624fa53ced4dab27215f438840",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-22\n📝 Original message:\u003e On Jul 22, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e On 7/22/2015 9:52 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\u003e It would be irresponsible and dangerous to the network and thus the users of the software to risk forks, or to take a leading role in pushing dramatic changes.\n\u003e \n\u003e Count me among those who see allowing bitcoin to become space-constrained, without technical reason, as a dramatic change. Especially when the reasons cited in support are\n\u003e \n\u003e - Various species of vaporware\n\u003e - Amateurish economic thinking surrounding fees\n\u003e - \"We don't support it because not everyone supports it because we don't support it because ...\" infinite descent\n\u003e \n\nI take it you mean allowing bitcoin to *not* become space-constrained - because all real-world computers are space-constrained…\n\n\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 842 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150722/6e8520af/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "85e40d39e71295df1dff507973f005059466907ad6d5e0782a2719f1e9444dcd0d1945375b6f0424df30efef492ced5e45e4c9dcd188f11867454fc02d8af3ea"
}