fiatjaf on Nostr: I tend to agree it's not cool for the biggest client to just invent new standards ...
I tend to agree it's not cool for the biggest client to just invent new standards without asking, but if he manages to make something that works and is backwards-compatible that could be good.
But I think the biggest issue here is that you've implemented NIP-94 on Amethyst in a way no one (I think) expected it to be implemented: for inline images -- which is probably a fault of the NIP and the discussions not ever being clear about their intents and purposes. We should address that by rewording the NIP.
Published at
2023-04-24 16:45:49Event JSON
{
"id": "23eff85023cc70ed03e5d99dc0fe0f471eca98142059d784747a562a8358ec0b",
"pubkey": "3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d",
"created_at": 1682354749,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c"
],
[
"p",
"32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245"
],
[
"e",
"727ca873207121e910e90f71add57e4ab2690abdb2905328e2005feff2914de1",
"wss://eden.nostr.land/",
"root"
]
],
"content": "I tend to agree it's not cool for the biggest client to just invent new standards without asking, but if he manages to make something that works and is backwards-compatible that could be good.\n\nBut I think the biggest issue here is that you've implemented NIP-94 on Amethyst in a way no one (I think) expected it to be implemented: for inline images -- which is probably a fault of the NIP and the discussions not ever being clear about their intents and purposes. We should address that by rewording the NIP.",
"sig": "9b011a44497becc71d64a0f805175ed3617fdebe1a8ae56d0e0005479220fc1eb6aa236a29e45cbc7aacdb3011e29da6f5b2bd157a6b89593e422df70de6fb9c"
}