Martijn Meijering [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2016-03-08 📝 Original message: Now that we almost have ...
📅 Original date posted:2016-03-08
📝 Original message:
Now that we almost have SegWit and its soft fork mechanism for upgrading
the scripting system, wouldn't it be a good idea to introduce a new opcode
for signature verification for arbitrary but appropriately
length-restricted messages? Instead of maintaining mirror images of txs and
going through the dance of revealing hash preimages, wouldn't it be easier
to to sign a message that revokes a previous balance (with hash + sequence
number)? Am I overlooking anything? This looks like a simple new opcode
that could substantially simplify the LN protocol.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20160308/cdec7da8/attachment-0001.html>
Published at
2023-06-09 12:45:58Event JSON
{
"id": "23e923f2c76b6e76db55d8bd90d41667aafec3bf977ca68aa9af1806b71d3863",
"pubkey": "c1fb5b269ddf0a717f7af22fb5083fc1bab73205f30f34119e207707687d0e65",
"created_at": 1686314758,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"01295a44113bc9f1a5076c0405ba9444a497a0673ace499dd3364d04cb3dc8b6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9456f7acb763eaab2e02bd8e60cf17df74f352c2ae579dce1f1dd25c95dd611c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-03-08\n📝 Original message:\nNow that we almost have SegWit and its soft fork mechanism for upgrading\nthe scripting system, wouldn't it be a good idea to introduce a new opcode\nfor signature verification for arbitrary but appropriately\nlength-restricted messages? Instead of maintaining mirror images of txs and\ngoing through the dance of revealing hash preimages, wouldn't it be easier\nto to sign a message that revokes a previous balance (with hash + sequence\nnumber)? Am I overlooking anything? This looks like a simple new opcode\nthat could substantially simplify the LN protocol.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20160308/cdec7da8/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "dc1d386e12dce22ff4e381bb746c1f79b5486c5c985e2c8b2e2c5f7080d8ff8260bcdf2bbd8882acb7cf056e806466e3f8af68e42fd26791c17cabc54036b52b"
}