We need a new form of Bitcoin-core.
- You propose a consensus change with a BIP and code to show for it.
- Every consensus change should have a review period of max number of days (maybe like 200).
- Have a pool of maybe 200 devs who are smart enough of review proposals.
- Its the responsibility of the proposer to advertise their proposal and get ACKs.
- Get enough tACKs in this window, then merge it.
- Miners will eventually just upgrade and it'll get activated.
- Stop involving finance people with software decisions.
- No debates on twitter, they go nowhere. If people have issues, then show up to talks and debate it live.
Make soft forks normal again.
Nitesh
npub1qg…g7y7n
2024-10-31 17:04:03
Author Public Key
npub1qgwhaaa2lsp54rl0hfx7qa3z678ax6wlre0em475rhpvl7n54cpqgg7y7nPublished at
2024-10-31 17:04:03Event JSON
{
"id": "2f7e6bbfe59b8b43c9584fa7aeee2a6cac6da230b3bf46ebd57b879914bf659d",
"pubkey": "021d7ef7aafc034a8fefba4de07622d78fd369df1e5f9dd7d41dc2cffa74ae02",
"created_at": 1730394243,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "We need a new form of Bitcoin-core. \n\n- You propose a consensus change with a BIP and code to show for it.\n\n- Every consensus change should have a review period of max number of days (maybe like 200). \n\n- Have a pool of maybe 200 devs who are smart enough of review proposals. \n\n- Its the responsibility of the proposer to advertise their proposal and get ACKs. \n\n- Get enough tACKs in this window, then merge it. \n\n- Miners will eventually just upgrade and it'll get activated. \n\n- Stop involving finance people with software decisions. \n\n- No debates on twitter, they go nowhere. If people have issues, then show up to talks and debate it live. \n\nMake soft forks normal again. \n",
"sig": "b46df7918364e498c08d1609845ed30edd81521a9bfe615b94433f19ffb54db5a5ad55b5972c17858813db506bbfaee60330ab4983ead691956edd3155293e4e"
}