BLOCKCHAINYOGI ₿⚡丰 on Nostr: Why it could be positive: • Cleaner way to store extra data: OP_RETURN lets people ...
Why it could be positive:
• Cleaner way to store extra data: OP_RETURN lets people attach data to Bitcoin in a way that nodes can delete later, which helps keep the system lighter over time.
• Better than alternatives: Without OP_RETURN, people use worse methods that bloat the blockchain permanently, making Bitcoin harder to run for everyone.
• Freedom with responsibility: If people are going to add data anyway, this change lets them do it in a way that’s more respectful to the network.
Why some might see it as negative:
• More “junk” on Bitcoin: Even though the data can be deleted by nodes later, it still has to be downloaded first, and there could be a lot more of it.
• Potential abuse: People might spam the blockchain with memes, files, or nonsense just because they can — even if they’re paying for it.
Bottom line:
This change probably leans positive because it gives people a better way to do something they’re already doing — without permanently clogging Bitcoin’s memory. It’s not perfect, but it’s an upgrade from worse behavior.
Published at
2025-04-30 01:37:42Event JSON
{
"id": "2d5a5caf47719a6e56eb7c75de42cf5aa62f851e6103958472dd9e7fe4b75085",
"pubkey": "9c47bb510f8e732abc68518f1e88d3dfcfe2fcc624cd9427aefc759d000381d0",
"created_at": 1745977062,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d7ce905ef0223fb29af4cacdda08604cab8530ca95965218557709fad3772b5a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"196e034f4dd2bc8d10968a122dff82677ddc9a00906cd18c4b1704b3e241477e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e096a89eeb90820895a6dfd7f369ec313654e5762e042d59ad06937659351479"
]
],
"content": "Why it could be positive:\n\t•\tCleaner way to store extra data: OP_RETURN lets people attach data to Bitcoin in a way that nodes can delete later, which helps keep the system lighter over time.\n\t•\tBetter than alternatives: Without OP_RETURN, people use worse methods that bloat the blockchain permanently, making Bitcoin harder to run for everyone.\n\t•\tFreedom with responsibility: If people are going to add data anyway, this change lets them do it in a way that’s more respectful to the network.\n\nWhy some might see it as negative:\n\t•\tMore “junk” on Bitcoin: Even though the data can be deleted by nodes later, it still has to be downloaded first, and there could be a lot more of it.\n\t•\tPotential abuse: People might spam the blockchain with memes, files, or nonsense just because they can — even if they’re paying for it.\n\nBottom line:\n\nThis change probably leans positive because it gives people a better way to do something they’re already doing — without permanently clogging Bitcoin’s memory. It’s not perfect, but it’s an upgrade from worse behavior.",
"sig": "49db2fc01df00a2f2b461ee22b93d5d04d548a1a5d1fb6247c3eff898eeab69aafdbee71e6736380a0133fd11ab4446996f1e7c9c508a618a2e71e5b1b8e8e66"
}