So, your point is that a court accepting Nostr as a legally enforceable contract is dependent on the success of a Twitter app using Nostr. Now that's absurd.
The basic elements required for the agreement to be a legally enforceable contract are mutual assent, expressed by a valid offer and acceptance; adequate consideration; capacity; and legality. If those elements are in place, you can write things in a napkin, without even signatures, that will be enforceable. Nostr conversations by themselves can become enforceable contracts. It doesn't matter if the twitter app succeeds or not.
Vitor Pamplona
npub1gc…fnj5z
2023-08-30 16:30:39
in reply to nevent1q…lpj4
Author Public Key
npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5zPublished at
2023-08-30 16:30:39Event JSON
{
"id": "2d4984013626d142f366cbe69879a9f078dcdfe3f69d3ac72001359af1f46723",
"pubkey": "460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c",
"created_at": 1693413039,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"33469e529d189046c012e0d6ece74d8f6682d6fff77ff0b997c2ad6486025a1c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ef6ce2e0b348e2c4bc630063c67b7eb4ea020029e83607b9cc71dc21b2cc1d96",
"wss://nostr.mom/",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b53b526889e8f070e94603f9dc9e498f7aaa6f74c857853c902242ff6b440ee5"
]
],
"content": "So, your point is that a court accepting Nostr as a legally enforceable contract is dependent on the success of a Twitter app using Nostr. Now that's absurd. \n\nThe basic elements required for the agreement to be a legally enforceable contract are mutual assent, expressed by a valid offer and acceptance; adequate consideration; capacity; and legality. If those elements are in place, you can write things in a napkin, without even signatures, that will be enforceable. Nostr conversations by themselves can become enforceable contracts. It doesn't matter if the twitter app succeeds or not. ",
"sig": "62b75e3eaf88012a555d059b2689f37a56f92f5ba3ec613a3355db55126bf39063967445a61484394e1a85d4ad6f053b9de7993e149043f1e9797ebc4b3925a9"
}