Alex Mizrahi [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-05-30 📝 Original message:> Why 2 MB ? > Why 20 MB? ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-05-30
📝 Original message:> Why 2 MB ?
>
Why 20 MB? Do you anticipate 20x transaction count growth in 2016?
Why not grow it by 1 MB per year?
This is a safer option, I don't think that anybody claims that 2 MB blocks
will be a problem.
And in 10 years when we get to 10 MB we'll get more evidence as to whether
network can handle 10 MB blocks.
So this might be a solution which would satisfy both sides:
* people who are concerned about block size growth will have an
opportunity to stop it before it grows too much (e.g. with a soft fork),
* while people who want bigger blocks will get an equivalent of 25% per
year growth within the first 10 years, which isn't bad, is it?
So far I haven't heard any valid arguments against linear growth.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150531/29b010f3/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:33:44Event JSON
{
"id": "2d504ed588a5be2afa7c21fd69ae2e17c1330143545ac330e12c2e1559f3a2c7",
"pubkey": "83939e4391e74ab1f02f783131a30a24db681188b72b90da8bce3dcaa763c8b4",
"created_at": 1686152024,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f8b5d67799444b0b408a010416662bfec521761783201657452331c18514fd28",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7e8f1e52b2a99ec320e201c85bc2493883b80d2dccb5ba77bf111b87874c057c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"421e1241aa8e9b5cefc15c0afd6585b27498be477646dabe4a63839879206cea"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-05-30\n📝 Original message:\u003e Why 2 MB ?\n\u003e\n\nWhy 20 MB? Do you anticipate 20x transaction count growth in 2016?\n\nWhy not grow it by 1 MB per year?\nThis is a safer option, I don't think that anybody claims that 2 MB blocks\nwill be a problem.\nAnd in 10 years when we get to 10 MB we'll get more evidence as to whether\nnetwork can handle 10 MB blocks.\n\nSo this might be a solution which would satisfy both sides:\n * people who are concerned about block size growth will have an\nopportunity to stop it before it grows too much (e.g. with a soft fork),\n * while people who want bigger blocks will get an equivalent of 25% per\nyear growth within the first 10 years, which isn't bad, is it?\n\nSo far I haven't heard any valid arguments against linear growth.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150531/29b010f3/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "eae367b67d07fb1ec14b6dcefeafb0d331d8e09c74f18379b543923181e82c7bb30366b6ebc8548817aa447fa56fd7deeece12749242bbcf2e20d5674a2fb4b7"
}