📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24
📝 Original message:Also, the current "type" attribute needs modification. There are different
degrees of "standard". Just because a lot of people do X doesn't need to
mean that doing X is "officially" endorsed by any other devs. At most
levels below 1, disagreements might be entirely tolerable for many things.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 2:06 PM Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Seems like a lot of effort and goodwill is being wasted on contention over
> things we don't really need to agree upon. In order to help us better
> prioritize, I propose adding an extra attribute to BIPs indicating their
> "level" which is split into five as follows:
>
> 1. Consensus (hard/soft fork)
> 2. Peer Services
> 3. RPC
> 4. Implementations
> 5. Applications
>
> I posted an example of what such a table might look like here: http://
> blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html
>
> If other folks also think this is a good idea I'll start working on a BIP
> draft for this.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150824/265093c5/attachment.html>;
Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1az…t2krq
2023-06-07 17:38:06
in reply to nevent1q…xhfp
Author Public Key
npub1azvhdrf9fu6n0tm7yez4j6zcxcedp2ct6nrcq3z74naqs7kgpk8s5t2krqPublished at
2023-06-07 17:38:06Event JSON
{
"id": "2a0177c171ae9e68e11adb40b7340cb139989da6efbf92ead4d0b6a49c304c56",
"pubkey": "e899768d254f3537af7e26455968583632d0ab0bd4c780445eacfa087ac80d8f",
"created_at": 1686159486,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ef9ec8bbcc2607482202a3529eeba762c4af4f6cbffe0377501d61855bb675d1",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"06502c23d3c8ff2bc31eed26b56b69a8008676d09f077227b5210593aae9fe2e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e899768d254f3537af7e26455968583632d0ab0bd4c780445eacfa087ac80d8f"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-24\n📝 Original message:Also, the current \"type\" attribute needs modification. There are different\ndegrees of \"standard\". Just because a lot of people do X doesn't need to\nmean that doing X is \"officially\" endorsed by any other devs. At most\nlevels below 1, disagreements might be entirely tolerable for many things.\n\nOn Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 2:06 PM Eric Lombrozo \u003celombrozo at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e Seems like a lot of effort and goodwill is being wasted on contention over\n\u003e things we don't really need to agree upon. In order to help us better\n\u003e prioritize, I propose adding an extra attribute to BIPs indicating their\n\u003e \"level\" which is split into five as follows:\n\u003e\n\u003e 1. Consensus (hard/soft fork)\n\u003e 2. Peer Services\n\u003e 3. RPC\n\u003e 4. Implementations\n\u003e 5. Applications\n\u003e\n\u003e I posted an example of what such a table might look like here: http://\n\u003e blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html\n\u003e\n\u003e If other folks also think this is a good idea I'll start working on a BIP\n\u003e draft for this.\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150824/265093c5/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "07af5340226469ec78673b0454708aa6f86bd7ea6209d2a3f531c2f40b12f4732e56778acdad635bf9f64173d266b8708c5d1456a14aa9f0d74186ca1afbd7ec"
}