Pieter Wuille [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-01-27 📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-01-27
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Kevin Greene <kgreenek at gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for an error field.
Agree, I think we need a way for client applications to interpret the response.
> Should the wallet broadcast the transaction to the bitcoin network when it
> receives an ACK, or always assume that the merchant server will do that?
In my opinion, that should be the primary meaning of receiving an ACK:
acknowledgement that the receiver takes responsibility for getting the
transaction confirmed (to the extent possible, of course).
--
Pieter
Published at
2023-06-07 15:12:35Event JSON
{
"id": "2adfe109bccc9cecf86b35b592364a28cdc1fcfaed989e08a79e50f2b78882b5",
"pubkey": "5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6",
"created_at": 1686150755,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"cd2b50b4c4e42fbfc1a32e56fc92dceb6f26c7bd94e21234287a2ef4a6ea523e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2ab26c39b114a898824a51875b20b24d20aa358b5e423c8fd2fed7899d06049b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"fc6123f773e0d098e3910aaf7c76fdd95f6bf538ab110d93606ce6fb46dd9f3f"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-27\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Kevin Greene \u003ckgreenek at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e +1 for an error field.\n\nAgree, I think we need a way for client applications to interpret the response.\n\n\u003e Should the wallet broadcast the transaction to the bitcoin network when it\n\u003e receives an ACK, or always assume that the merchant server will do that?\n\nIn my opinion, that should be the primary meaning of receiving an ACK:\nacknowledgement that the receiver takes responsibility for getting the\ntransaction confirmed (to the extent possible, of course).\n\n\n-- \nPieter",
"sig": "b8e39bcb3141ac786f69d0dc4bfa7fda4807bbfd51b525b6efeeb241f30ecab1589eb8b59b92918c06671b7e86ba54b1a0186f8d82a3b630d2be3450ce52e5e6"
}