📅 Original date posted:2015-07-30
📝 Original message:On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev
>
>
> > Miners who don't validate have a habit of bleeding money: that's the
> > system working as designed.
>
> The information I have currently is that the parties engaging in that
> activity found it to be tremendously profitable, even including losses
> from issues.
This got buried in another thread. Putting it out in case anyone has any
insight.
Does anyone have any data on which of the above two viewpoints is actually
correct? Measuring / publishing these effects will go a long way in either
(a) establishing credibility of the 'system design' or (b) trigger a
conversation on what needs fixing.
If there is no such known data, and someone new to Bitcoin would like to do
that, where would be a good place to start, if it is at all possible.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150730/974f1ee3/attachment.html>;
Sriram Karra [ARCHIVE] /
npub19x…jxfq5
2023-06-07 15:44:13
in reply to nevent1q…pzwm
Author Public Key
npub19xyna0ghqxhzzkgufu9gcu7cavnfdex7ce8g263wru7a6psw4hvsnjxfq5Published at
2023-06-07 15:44:13Event JSON
{
"id": "28e6c6477068cc6414a1e5379e29774dc2496dd68430b6fe4e5fb0efaaf88df4",
"pubkey": "29893ebd1701ae21591c4f0a8c73d8eb2696e4dec64e856a2e1f3ddd060eadd9",
"created_at": 1686152653,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f0c5251eae376006ac450163ab929b4a47ceb997e1c0e103e3f6042b1dec5d78",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-30\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\nOn Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e Miners who don't validate have a habit of bleeding money: that's the\n\u003e \u003e system working as designed.\n\u003e\n\u003e The information I have currently is that the parties engaging in that\n\u003e activity found it to be tremendously profitable, even including losses\n\u003e from issues.\n\n\nThis got buried in another thread. Putting it out in case anyone has any\ninsight.\n\nDoes anyone have any data on which of the above two viewpoints is actually\ncorrect? Measuring / publishing these effects will go a long way in either\n(a) establishing credibility of the 'system design' or (b) trigger a\nconversation on what needs fixing.\n\nIf there is no such known data, and someone new to Bitcoin would like to do\nthat, where would be a good place to start, if it is at all possible.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150730/974f1ee3/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "8986bceed1c9544c1468219993dd9f2720983c45424e84bbb75991a5cc4c4785d6a7091f4b92b3d64ba87a5fe698d75934b128a6bfd4deaa9ca557a78c28dcfd"
}