RedTailHawk on Nostr: You're correct. Likes are not "worthless". Corndalorian needs to think about this ...
You're correct. Likes are not "worthless".
Corndalorian needs to think about this with a mathematical proof level of rigor. Anything less is intellectual dishonest and posturing for the sake of virtue signaling to peers.
Likes have value. It can be used to signal that content has been witnessed or it can be used to signal that an incoming reply is non-adversarial.
Published at
2025-04-14 17:01:36Event JSON
{
"id": "2534071e703d400fd1fdd3e3edb938fa9454aeaf6e428ac526a744c65cd52ce6",
"pubkey": "1549ed4be71d1a70ea2dca4596cd0c54c61aea485c6e4e5a8ca463758c98dd4a",
"created_at": 1744650096,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"bc1a6973f151f269a16a225825dc3a0c0b6b32e1848662ea031d7f0230998b3f",
"wss://a.nos.lol",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b82b252809c84f7599b146f4a35f30252dff7f234c0d0e18412315e9c5ff4480",
"wss://a.nos.lol",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dd1f9d502c7951df47e8f8ed245e8bfa24f7e82c28f19399a8f0e74b06113a21"
],
[
"p",
"f8e6c64342f1e052480630e27e1016dce35fc3a614e60434fef4aa2503328ca9"
]
],
"content": "You're correct. Likes are not \"worthless\".\nCorndalorian needs to think about this with a mathematical proof level of rigor. Anything less is intellectual dishonest and posturing for the sake of virtue signaling to peers.\n\nLikes have value. It can be used to signal that content has been witnessed or it can be used to signal that an incoming reply is non-adversarial.",
"sig": "e07c992ba1670d45ed9d7506f21ace194fd167ce99dfb9288764b2e0738be50f7111f1d09b17b5e8b1c19bfc3883f41d170eac4674a56f143fe044d85cc3953f"
}