Event JSON
{
"id": "278b3cdbec0b4c663bbd086348f1155c6081eda4eba23d1d6187708a0ebecd0f",
"pubkey": "1a214ce4654ebc93fae6200de9a46353116772e3e87467c7bd975b0f61cf0e34",
"created_at": 1689250940,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e7f76f0d1fdf887c12cbf5eaf15dd3bb0b88f806051739f63200aae91a8a734e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"e5af2b1a2b841c80d36b5110c55edaf6d833fe8f8eb119f6245f0a8704de91fa",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/users/rtushnet/statuses/110706749615929797"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ulmk7rglm7y8cykt7h40zhwnhv9c37qxq5tnna3jqz4wjx52wd8q2whweg In this case, no--legitimately made goods can become counterfeit through alterations, but courts still require a sale after the alteration to call them counterfeit. I think this is a dumb way of claiming post-sale confusion.",
"sig": "7aa3282e6c16660cfcd31ca3b99af752e1374e448c606fae2398ac095c108fc9b8834628291a5ec7be5ac80b2e54eaffcf6fa428d098c446ecca41108d2597b2"
}