Event JSON
{
"id": "4100238c3b7ad930dcbf084234c7a52afd53b28b8e0c7fefe7d4894fa2f9e4b0",
"pubkey": "20502883ace25666fa4de12ff6fc01b2a6a654d89e28342ed523c3d262c4a2fc",
"created_at": 1702722360,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"39dc1e9f4dad54ee77ab7167f5e21b61c40ddc7ef7c8b1f58303de5316d4b3a8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"06ffd1da8226d5ca7b574ef384f7aacfe07cfe7519bf0f684aafe28f041538d8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"bc4d55ae34e51196a0e152de8d4d5eff9166cff04e0a4d66df8f1a0063c5e3f6",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"9be21611a341426e9146257c54179e22d178bb7d4106e247ddf3e507b7985a6b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"b7e451399656bc71cb04e42c99bbf4b4f9ebaaa824cfd3bddcc3bc66c01c7a61",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://gultsch.social/users/daniel/statuses/111589612624452547",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub188wpa86d442wuaatw9nltcsmv8zqmhr77lytravrq009x9k5kw5q64eqpn to be clear I’m not saying that Conversations’ method is more efficient. It's just that nostr:npub1qmlark5zym2u576hfmecfaa2els8eln4rxls76z24l3g7pq48rvq2ymdus speaks of their own method as 'destroying the user’s battery' while I know for a fact the implementation in Conversations is not.\nMy assumption is rather that they vastly exaggerate the battery impact of their own implementation to make GCM seem like something they absolutely have to use.\nSignals battery impact might be completely acceptable and Conversations’ only very marginally better",
"sig": "ea6370d7ef9eeb3bf1cb3c74a48dca0eb7e281845f6c1dbf8de6b50ef8061575ce08998177b61c1090628a2c4eb8cfd3e2f83a2aff93ba6c1fb75851217b29db"
}