📅 Original date posted:2013-06-28
📝 Original message:There are good, valid arguments in support of promoting both the reference
client, Bitcoin-QT, and for offering a lighter-weight alternative. Why not
outline these arguments on bitcoin.org and provide links to each; or even
links to a variety of alternative wallet solutions alongside descriptions
of their respective benefits and drawbacks? Is there an advantage to having
a singular "recommended" client?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Bill Hees <billhees at gmail.com> wrote:
> There are good, valid arguments in support of promoting both the reference
> client, Bitcoin-QT, and for offering a lighter-weight alternative. Why not
> outline these arguments on bitcoin.org and provide links to each; or even
> links to a variety of alternative wallet solutions alongside descriptions
> of their respective benefits and drawbacks? Is there an advantage to having
> a singular "recommended" client?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I vote "yes" to have MultiBit replace Bitcoin-Qt as the recommended
>> desktop wallet app. I think most users will be happier with it.
>>
>> If I'm wrong, it is easy to change back.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>
>> Build for Windows Store.
>>
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130628/09f689ed/attachment.html>;
Bill Hees [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tj…wlsdp
2023-06-07 15:04:08
in reply to nevent1q…cddm
Author Public Key
npub1tjua87wlnpygwwth8xp5er9e0td64gxe3fzv7m8lu7s0c75s8e6qrwlsdpPublished at
2023-06-07 15:04:08Event JSON
{
"id": "426119f2b8ba0706e990e4a924778623c9bb09d0c6c6f2333684961c40526a25",
"pubkey": "5cb9d3f9df984887397739834c8cb97adbaaa0d98a44cf6cffe7a0fc7a903e74",
"created_at": 1686150248,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5ec662796ac6f7c2f8d4618ee0bafe23cd8003de44ad7e1121634fb73b588358",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"32fe507de984e348392f341e0c5bb313df3d9a6e5e01e1bf84e63d6b3167fa16",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-06-28\n📝 Original message:There are good, valid arguments in support of promoting both the reference\nclient, Bitcoin-QT, and for offering a lighter-weight alternative. Why not\noutline these arguments on bitcoin.org and provide links to each; or even\nlinks to a variety of alternative wallet solutions alongside descriptions\nof their respective benefits and drawbacks? Is there an advantage to having\na singular \"recommended\" client?\n\n\nOn Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Bill Hees \u003cbillhees at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e There are good, valid arguments in support of promoting both the reference\n\u003e client, Bitcoin-QT, and for offering a lighter-weight alternative. Why not\n\u003e outline these arguments on bitcoin.org and provide links to each; or even\n\u003e links to a variety of alternative wallet solutions alongside descriptions\n\u003e of their respective benefits and drawbacks? Is there an advantage to having\n\u003e a singular \"recommended\" client?\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Gavin Andresen \u003cgavinandresen at gmail.com\u003ewrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e I vote \"yes\" to have MultiBit replace Bitcoin-Qt as the recommended\n\u003e\u003e desktop wallet app. I think most users will be happier with it.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e If I'm wrong, it is easy to change back.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e\u003e This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Build for Windows Store.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130628/09f689ed/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "13e03bf1012df91e1585bb0e093e4918d2a6f71e1c48d7742b5c3405e155f152b878f5fafc25b0353f54354161296a898c9385183b890bc2361273996d56a4a6"
}