fritz45 on Nostr: I don’t think people are arguing against it per se. I think a lot of people want ...

I don’t think people are arguing against it per se. I think a lot of people want something that can only be achieved that way at least anytime soon, aren’t willing to contribute if they aren’t going to make money and then wonder why they don’t have the thing. Like a bank or credit processing system that doesn’t report gun purchases to the government. You probably need a bank owned by shareholders that specifically opposed to policies like that and the only way to get that is probably for those people to get together in the millions and chip in 50 bucks a piece and then lock in ownership. Not have it be a publicly traded company and you probably won’t get funding from the feds or the fed. So yeah. Making money? Probably not happening anytime soon. It did a better job of achieving your ends than spending the same money in politics would have though. And how many of those people donated more than 20 bucks a piece to political pro gun organizations to do that, to no effect.

Want a bank that will loan money to buy non traditionally shaped houses or look at the value of the soil on two different farms and charge based on that instead of just the value of the house and the amount of land? Same thing.