📅 Original date posted:2019-06-09
📝 Original message:>I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be >resetted just because there is
>a (probably better) alternative for it. The >testnet is still a thing and
>is also used.
Like Bryan said, lot of miners test here. E.g. new firmware versions, hardware prototypes and operation services. Difficulty will be on current levels in a short period of time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190609/25bbb05c/attachment.html>;
Tim Menapace [ARCHIVE] /
npub16a…ktnuz
2023-06-07 18:18:41
in reply to nevent1q…rup8
Author Public Key
npub16adrlgk4zhlvymjkap9xwj5hssar87lfs7968uzlxr9pgsnmna0qcktnuzPublished at
2023-06-07 18:18:41Event JSON
{
"id": "472207af92fd0cf8ec26f116489989b59de0518e8913e15287a708476b1b70bc",
"pubkey": "d75a3fa2d515fec26e56e84a674a97843a33fbe9878ba3f05f30ca14427b9f5e",
"created_at": 1686161921,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"20827828aa2f6d4d8d605d48ddedc877db96e7a4df827d536d6425074a67143f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-06-09\n📝 Original message:\u003eI don't get why the testnet shouldn't be \u003eresetted just because there is \n\u003ea (probably better) alternative for it. The \u003etestnet is still a thing and \n\u003eis also used.\n\nLike Bryan said, lot of miners test here. E.g. new firmware versions, hardware prototypes and operation services. Difficulty will be on current levels in a short period of time.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190609/25bbb05c/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "0030f8955d054a3351247189f741d699e49dbe5a93f10a25b0cb255dad3331f3c3519fe6745fdea835e3f5047160e522fc7ecb6b38acbf60db6c555854d267a9"
}