I think the name Bitcoin itself is useful, from a marketing perspective for the network.
But otherwise it’s about as technically relevant as the poker code that was in the early implementation. Similar to “Sterling” for GBP - useful as a context setter but beyond that, not needed.
aidan
npub1n2…l5j65
2025-01-04 13:31:19
in reply to nevent1q…alhz
Author Public Key
npub1n2vwvkepru9y2kuxnmsxamp2nxeyx9wwdpznphz70kucn8ak0r3s0l5j65Published at
2025-01-04 13:31:19Event JSON
{
"id": "476353aa4eb06a1481527cae1b521f59f98da82effe712c0e28a444c4a57b544",
"pubkey": "9a98e65b211f0a455b869ee06eec2a99b24315ce684530dc5e7db9899fb678e3",
"created_at": 1735997479,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4c5b58e8da5d35afd7fd2b2d6b0d31cb671754d7423fc6e97cc551b4ac6cf442",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"53e77ed9f3499aa02be27e926d167748a886646f2ace6da60f583a724e1229f5",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b481d853bdd549c8cad18dcc1fb1fc8dba6e96b60278fcec388bb15967f95a2d"
]
],
"content": "I think the name Bitcoin itself is useful, from a marketing perspective for the network. \n\nBut otherwise it’s about as technically relevant as the poker code that was in the early implementation. Similar to “Sterling” for GBP - useful as a context setter but beyond that, not needed.",
"sig": "bcc8f40f33a766b1090e7977612c95cf7f501ae9bf7515cfd5bc325e4e789810614de128ef9569cc85644fbef00a6e0b0256050e4c86ed6026eb247c1d527524"
}