ð
Original date posted:2017-12-06
ð Original message:On 12/05/2017 08:49 PM, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> ...
> This vulnerability can be fixed if withdrawals are restricted to
> simple P2PKH or P2WPKH only,
Limiting the withdrawal outputs to P2PKH and perhaps P2WPKH (would there
be any network benefit to supporting witness pubkeys for withdrawals?)
wouldn't be too much work for me. The downside is that people might want
to withdraw to multisig scripts, or any other legitimate P2SH. If it
prevents a huge issue, then it is probably worth it.
> but in the presence of Scriptless Script and Bellare-Neven signatures,
> that may be sufficient to create the Theft Contract and the Accomplice
> Contract (but I know too little of Scriptless Script to be sure).
>
> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj
>
I'm curious if anyone on this list could help answer this.
Thanks!
CryptAxe [ARCHIVE] /
npub12pâŠjs309
2023-06-07 18:08:11
in reply to nevent1qâŠk8yh
Author Public Key
npub12p7jzesdg8kxdg8rujr20znnd868fgugczkwh4cyxwa6gnxj5sxsnjs309Published at
2023-06-07 18:08:11Event JSON
{
"id": "461feb73f68869e0f43340ea92f3dfe174854f1985391622609a8721bd218f37",
"pubkey": "507d21660d41ec66a0e3e486a78a7369f474a388c0acebd70433bba44cd2a40d",
"created_at": 1686161291,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c96ad839ccc24a876eef1f6059684f6b22ca896fbabb922d4cebc940941cd895",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"4a57b1311e2609532ae2ba6aaceb761e6e97fcadd362b33c18bc092569c2c69f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861"
]
],
"content": "ð
Original date posted:2017-12-06\nð Original message:On 12/05/2017 08:49 PM, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\n\u003e ...\n\u003e This vulnerability can be fixed if withdrawals are restricted to\n\u003e simple P2PKH or P2WPKH only,\n\nLimiting the withdrawal outputs to P2PKH and perhaps P2WPKH (would there\nbe any network benefit to supporting witness pubkeys for withdrawals?)\nwouldn't be too much work for me. The downside is that people might want\nto withdraw to multisig scripts, or any other legitimate P2SH. If it\nprevents a huge issue, then it is probably worth it.\n\n\n\u003e but in the presence of Scriptless Script and Bellare-Neven signatures,\n\u003e that may be sufficient to create the Theft Contract and the Accomplice\n\u003e Contract (but I know too little of Scriptless Script to be sure).\n\u003e\n\u003e Regards,\n\u003e ZmnSCPxj\n\u003e\n\nI'm curious if anyone on this list could help answer this.\n\nThanks!",
"sig": "f997be5059c6e30065813e7a4513d76f9905eefb00783130a0cdeee3600a4fa55f75b57f1963bda887a5557d987eec0e307b4e53811a103a66e40e0d1233488d"
}