📅 Original date posted:2011-12-17
🗒️ Summary of this message: Gavin Andresen discusses the potential use of DHT's for transactions and the need for a secure scheme against malicious attacks. He also considers the possibility of full nodes refusing requests from lightweight nodes.
📝 Original message:There was a discussion about using DHT's for transactions a while back
on the forums:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=723.msg7908#msg7908
If you can figure out a scheme that is secure from malicious Sybil
attacks then you're smarter than I am.
And additional protocol messages for lightweight clients is a good
idea, as long as they don't make it a lot easier to pull off a
denial-of-service attacks on a "full" node.
Although I do also wonder if we'll ever run into a problem with full
nodes refusing to answer requests from lightweight nodes (there might
be a tragedy-of-the-commons problem lurking there).
--
--
Gavin Andresen
Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s4…d44kw
2023-06-07 02:51:04
in reply to nevent1q…2tct
Author Public Key
npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwPublished at
2023-06-07 02:51:04Event JSON
{
"id": "461f09b68b3813fd42f45ff45736539df96333c0dad637239c394d6c677ffecd",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686106264,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4af0205fae641367dcfd78e02a7a0b6f75f880a1f702affe5d70f7b792eb8207",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d66010b023b25701a779a56effce11530f9d94481fae8316aebb1fffeba9df90",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a277336e95d2d0a831fff67fc80d8082322689a88ede9f877fa246a02629a43f"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2011-12-17\n🗒️ Summary of this message: Gavin Andresen discusses the potential use of DHT's for transactions and the need for a secure scheme against malicious attacks. He also considers the possibility of full nodes refusing requests from lightweight nodes.\n📝 Original message:There was a discussion about using DHT's for transactions a while back\non the forums:\n https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=723.msg7908#msg7908\n\nIf you can figure out a scheme that is secure from malicious Sybil\nattacks then you're smarter than I am.\n\nAnd additional protocol messages for lightweight clients is a good\nidea, as long as they don't make it a lot easier to pull off a\ndenial-of-service attacks on a \"full\" node.\n\nAlthough I do also wonder if we'll ever run into a problem with full\nnodes refusing to answer requests from lightweight nodes (there might\nbe a tragedy-of-the-commons problem lurking there).\n\n--\n--\nGavin Andresen",
"sig": "d653c84b05dc34d72c20b1280070d165ea090bbb8fbd603520150195790906bff6d8410d8bd1540b095130d610ee73b89ec3969d18ee3b2f3a869014e79731c2"
}