Ross Nicoll [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-23 📝 Original message:Also, before that's turned ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-23
📝 Original message:Also, before that's turned into "8MB blocks are infeasible", my presumption is that blocks are not expected to jump suddenly to 8MB, and that most will have time to ramp up storage and bandwidth.
The point about not outright replacing existing test data is the more critical one, anyway, although in retrospect we could simply add spam transactions on top of existing transactions.
Ross
On 23 Jun 2015 08:35, Ross Nicoll <jrn at jrn.me.uk> wrote:
Published at
2023-06-07 15:39:55Event JSON
{
"id": "45e4e69ee57fd76908c047ae1af41035d2e1e1343bb06ffe4182018adc9ff2ba",
"pubkey": "787ecd48da0d9610d322fb67c86ad23a5287d688559b2ff8ee546721fd990129",
"created_at": 1686152395,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1936c15d372dc9e8a0eaf645dcff207375e90675dbebfadcf82370abc654737d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0ae2404de542e4bc7fd54f7e85084e7bd4f9d17b770546c3c4f20fae98672e45",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"46986f86b97cc97829a031b03209644d134b939d0163375467f0b1363e0d875e"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-23\n📝 Original message:Also, before that's turned into \"8MB blocks are infeasible\", my presumption is that blocks are not expected to jump suddenly to 8MB, and that most will have time to ramp up storage and bandwidth.\n\nThe point about not outright replacing existing test data is the more critical one, anyway, although in retrospect we could simply add spam transactions on top of existing transactions.\n\nRoss\n\nOn 23 Jun 2015 08:35, Ross Nicoll \u003cjrn at jrn.me.uk\u003e wrote:",
"sig": "d16fb75f58755873a15beb4b2805dddb59ae6dcc86953daf654e5d8c6dab55fd88422fab3ccf62bcb02e52aed520ea30b4f1a8125acb644da0dac344423ea132"
}