Libertarian Institute on Nostr: The Social Security and Medicare Scams by Laurence Vance Charlotte Cowles is a ...
The Social Security and Medicare Scams
by Laurence Vance
Charlotte Cowles is a financial advice columnist for The Cut,
“a New York Magazine site dedicated to women’s lives and interests,
including politics, work, money, relationships, style, and parenting.”
She recently lost $50,000 when she fell for a scam,
put that amount in cash in a shoe box, and handed it over to a stranger
that she was duped into thinking was an undercover CIA agent.
The scam she fell for is not that unusual. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC),
consumers reported losing nearly $8.8 billion to scams in 2022. The FTC
received fraud reports from 2.4 million consumers. The top five scams
were imposter scams; online shopping scams; prizes, sweepstakes, and
lotteries; investment-related reports; and business and job
opportunities.
Not mentioned by the FTC or reported on by any magazine is that the
federal government operates two of the biggest scams that have deceived
Americans for decades: Social Security and Medicare.
Instituted during the New Deal of President Franklin Roosevelt in
1935, Social Security is the federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability
Insurance (OASDI) program that provides monthly benefits for retirement,
disability, survivorship, and death to about 65 million Americans,
including survivors and dependents, making it the largest federal
domestic program.
Instituted during the Great Society of President Lyndon Johnson in
1965, Medicare is government-funded health care for Americans 65 years
old and older and for those who are permanently disabled, have end-stage
renal disease, or ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease). About 65 million
Americans are enrolled in Medicare, and it is the second-largest federal
domestic program.
The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) of 1935 (amended in
1965) imposes on every person’s gross income an employee payroll tax
designated for Social Security and Medicare, with matching contributions
from employers. The Self-Employed Contributions Act (SECA) of 1954
requires that self-employed individuals pay Social Security and Medicare
tax on their net earnings if they are at least $400.
Social Security is funded by a 12.4 percent payroll tax (split
equally between employers and employees) on the first $168,600 of
employee income. Medicare is funded by a 2.9 percent payroll tax (split
equally between employers and employees) on every dollar of employee
income. Employees (but not employers) pay an additional 0.9 percent
Medicare tax on wages over $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for
married couples filing jointly. Self-employed persons pay the full 12.4
percent Social Security tax and 2.9 percent Medicare tax but receive a
tax deduction equal to 50 percent of the amount of payroll taxes they
paid. They are also subject to the additional 0.9 percent Medicare tax,
if applicable.
Although labeled as such, these taxes are anything but
“contributions.” Employers who don’t properly withhold Social Security
taxes face fines and imprisonment. Although you can opt out of Social
Security and Medicare by not signing up for them when you are eligible
in your 60s, you can never opt out of having to pay Social Security and
Medicare taxes your entire working life. And no one is entitled to get
any of his “contributions” back should he decide not to enroll in Social
Security or Medicare.
Social Security and Medicare taxes withheld from paychecks are not
invested or deposited in an account with the taxpayer’s name on it, and
there is no real trust fund or physical lock box where these taxes are
set aside for future use. All payroll taxes collected end up in the U.S.
Treasury along with personal and corporate income taxes, estate and
gifts taxes, and excise taxes. Social Security and Medicare benefits are
paid out of current government revenues.
The Supreme Court has ruled that no one is entitled to receive Social
Security or Medicare benefits because he “paid into the system” his
whole working life. In fact, there is no correlation between payroll
taxes collected and Social Security and Medicare benefits paid. Congress
could at any time raise or eliminate the Social Security wage base
and/or increase the payroll tax rates for Social Security Medicare (or
both) on employers or employees (or both) while not changing benefits a
whit.
Social Security and Medicare benefits could be reduced at any time.
Benefits for both programs could be means tested. The retirement age for
Social Security could be raised. The eligibility age for Medicare could
be raised. Cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security could be
reduced or eliminated. Medicare could eliminate coverage for certain
medical procedures, raise deductibles, and/or increase co-payments. And
payroll taxes could be raised at the same time.
Social Security and Medicare taxes exist simply for the purpose of
raising revenue. If the taxes extracted from Americans’ paychecks were
called by the government simply “payroll taxes,” instead of Social
Security and Medicare taxes, then the fact that these programs are just
welfare programs would be quite evident.
Don’t be scammed by the government, politicians, and the AARP about
Social Security and Medicare. View them for what they are:
intergenerational income-transfer schemes and wealth-redistribution
programs.
Published at
2024-04-02 19:12:38Event JSON
{
"id": "487707114b4d91c41a738af7178d80a2a9ec511f22e68d14b89fce6168709b9d",
"pubkey": "94a674a8037e314f6b0f06f3e8fae8bbda7947841f103cdee4654772b5c48d88",
"created_at": 1712085158,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "The Social Security and Medicare Scams\n by Laurence Vance\n\nCharlotte Cowles is a financial advice columnist for The Cut,\n “a New York Magazine site dedicated to women’s lives and interests, \nincluding politics, work, money, relationships, style, and parenting.” \nShe recently lost $50,000 when she fell for a scam,\n put that amount in cash in a shoe box, and handed it over to a stranger\n that she was duped into thinking was an undercover CIA agent.\nThe scam she fell for is not that unusual. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC),\n consumers reported losing nearly $8.8 billion to scams in 2022. The FTC\n received fraud reports from 2.4 million consumers. The top five scams \nwere imposter scams; online shopping scams; prizes, sweepstakes, and \nlotteries; investment-related reports; and business and job \nopportunities.\nNot mentioned by the FTC or reported on by any magazine is that the \nfederal government operates two of the biggest scams that have deceived \nAmericans for decades: Social Security and Medicare.\nInstituted during the New Deal of President Franklin Roosevelt in \n1935, Social Security is the federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability \nInsurance (OASDI) program that provides monthly benefits for retirement,\n disability, survivorship, and death to about 65 million Americans, \nincluding survivors and dependents, making it the largest federal \ndomestic program.\n\nInstituted during the Great Society of President Lyndon Johnson in \n1965, Medicare is government-funded health care for Americans 65 years \nold and older and for those who are permanently disabled, have end-stage\n renal disease, or ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease). About 65 million \nAmericans are enrolled in Medicare, and it is the second-largest federal\n domestic program.\n\nThe Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) of 1935 (amended in \n1965) imposes on every person’s gross income an employee payroll tax \ndesignated for Social Security and Medicare, with matching contributions\n from employers. The Self-Employed Contributions Act (SECA) of 1954 \nrequires that self-employed individuals pay Social Security and Medicare\n tax on their net earnings if they are at least $400.\n\nSocial Security is funded by a 12.4 percent payroll tax (split \nequally between employers and employees) on the first $168,600 of \nemployee income. Medicare is funded by a 2.9 percent payroll tax (split \nequally between employers and employees) on every dollar of employee \nincome. Employees (but not employers) pay an additional 0.9 percent \nMedicare tax on wages over $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for \nmarried couples filing jointly. Self-employed persons pay the full 12.4 \npercent Social Security tax and 2.9 percent Medicare tax but receive a \ntax deduction equal to 50 percent of the amount of payroll taxes they \npaid. They are also subject to the additional 0.9 percent Medicare tax, \nif applicable.\n\nAlthough labeled as such, these taxes are anything but \n“contributions.” Employers who don’t properly withhold Social Security \ntaxes face fines and imprisonment. Although you can opt out of Social \nSecurity and Medicare by not signing up for them when you are eligible \nin your 60s, you can never opt out of having to pay Social Security and \nMedicare taxes your entire working life. And no one is entitled to get \nany of his “contributions” back should he decide not to enroll in Social\n Security or Medicare.\n\nSocial Security and Medicare taxes withheld from paychecks are not \ninvested or deposited in an account with the taxpayer’s name on it, and \nthere is no real trust fund or physical lock box where these taxes are \nset aside for future use. All payroll taxes collected end up in the U.S.\n Treasury along with personal and corporate income taxes, estate and \ngifts taxes, and excise taxes. Social Security and Medicare benefits are\n paid out of current government revenues.\n\nThe Supreme Court has ruled that no one is entitled to receive Social\n Security or Medicare benefits because he “paid into the system” his \nwhole working life. In fact, there is no correlation between payroll \ntaxes collected and Social Security and Medicare benefits paid. Congress\n could at any time raise or eliminate the Social Security wage base \nand/or increase the payroll tax rates for Social Security Medicare (or \nboth) on employers or employees (or both) while not changing benefits a \nwhit.\n\nSocial Security and Medicare benefits could be reduced at any time. \nBenefits for both programs could be means tested. The retirement age for\n Social Security could be raised. The eligibility age for Medicare could\n be raised. Cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security could be \nreduced or eliminated. Medicare could eliminate coverage for certain \nmedical procedures, raise deductibles, and/or increase co-payments. And \npayroll taxes could be raised at the same time.\n\nSocial Security and Medicare taxes exist simply for the purpose of \nraising revenue. If the taxes extracted from Americans’ paychecks were \ncalled by the government simply “payroll taxes,” instead of Social \nSecurity and Medicare taxes, then the fact that these programs are just \nwelfare programs would be quite evident.\nDon’t be scammed by the government, politicians, and the AARP about \nSocial Security and Medicare. View them for what they are: \nintergenerational income-transfer schemes and wealth-redistribution \nprograms.",
"sig": "c4218e52439834d39feca91b2d20d5cdd6d172c4fa9c6db65927dee362fcacfc1874ce555865e799bc5d75ddc1f11548bc20c70076bf2e7b593aff31eee2e077"
}