unknown on Nostr: First of all thanks for the engagement too man, much appreciated! This is the reason ...

First of all thanks for the engagement too man, much appreciated! This is the reason why I'm here: to exchange ideas and think together😄

1) I guess here my concern is that if we let the free market decide, and in the end it decides that btc is a database for whatever rather than for p2p money transaction, I'd be devasteted and lose hope forever in achieving a world of freedom and cooperation. I get that we should achieve this "utopia" organically and withouth restrictions, but maybe I'm too emotionally involved and want to scream "no this is only for monetary transaction and we must protect it at all cost pushing out any other case as much as we can!"

2) here I thinks nobody really knows what the consequences will be. Even core devs used expression like "...with this change "spammers" SHOULD use OP_return instead of other more harmful ways". But what worries me is: why are we concern about the block not being full for miners at this moment in time? the btc reward is more thank enough now, even with an empty block. I think the "too low fees for miners" could be a valid concern in the future but not now. I mean, is any miner going to stop mining NOW or in the next 10 years even if the block are empty? isn't the mining reward enough?

3) On one side I agree, btc is what we organically and democratically decide it to be. On the other side the white paper clearly stastes "a p2p money transfer protocol", and I guess I am a btc maxi who wants to keep btc the way it was originally intended