supermassive on Nostr: can definitely agree there, but again you are now assuming that the next shitcoin ...
can definitely agree there, but again you are now assuming that the next shitcoin group won’t pop up and find a new non-standard abuse to exploit.
we should not accommodate these behaviors and introduce an incentive to attack bitcoin to get devs to ack changes that are “technically sound”
Published at
2025-04-30 19:24:29Event JSON
{
"id": "400569879fe3e7e450168c49e4357a300e582cf4edbfdac9d7a31a99daf5e750",
"pubkey": "7d0f45e1179d5f7c47001684c7d20e8c38f82ee6fdb2104609c5c61ebf9dbbc8",
"created_at": 1746041069,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"dd7cd965604a40e9e34f3001fe565748b89cb3c373c5ddb07867b19832d1d1e2",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f6d5c7c6bc9face554d71a3ea624948cc577bc09d7015f39f45464a2b1b20ac4",
"wss://nos.lol",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e1ff3bfdd4e40315959b08b4fcc8245eaa514637e1d4ec2ae166b743341be1af",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"3c559080f647074a638e9cc6d4c487a06bfab810402aab9a6794fb49a053153e",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "can definitely agree there, but again you are now assuming that the next shitcoin group won’t pop up and find a new non-standard abuse to exploit.\n\nwe should not accommodate these behaviors and introduce an incentive to attack bitcoin to get devs to ack changes that are “technically sound”",
"sig": "93cee9b5751a52d4df4df7006ad576720d7eeb7e017d8f3999fe9aa9de66ae16c220ffd82f25ac2b7b9718846662c21946acd6c0cffd3cb5b6cfe030568f0f90"
}