Event JSON
{
"id": "40524e94352b8a1250ccbdc762466cc1bde307f94c8f3d55d339bd90f5d39e31",
"pubkey": "7f15964c5be74665c9bc61b4ed576dc32c631ddef1e81fff7d76ceaa6c3c2f03",
"created_at": 1709075943,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"fc3ee9eac1226d28983115b526ab21e0e889373d75bf385cb36d4a73128fc89a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"40c5eea5a8e635e95a5f2693c79b6e78e27d2cfb59ba9e2f85e46ad229fe9aca",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"730b7bc2802fd7534832725550f64143c59ec086b5661283d2c425d8c1a632c5",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.world/users/david1/statuses/112006001011714617",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1lslwn6kpyfkj3xp3zk6jd2epur5gjdeawklnsh9nd498xy50ezdqfz9c2x I would say the Thomas/Gorsuch view Section 230 turns media companies into common carriers makes more sense than you make it out to be. Section 230 allows companies to legally do content moderation but only if such actions are \"taken in good faith\". For example, if left wing spam, but not right wing spam, is blocked, it's not in good faith. But this inability to be partisan about spams is what is meant by calling them \"common carriers\".",
"sig": "e02298d6c73a315dedbc91bdc74600b3fe12e02c4b1bfa139b9efecef6f351b909b40442d28f49f053ec85e5b729e896a246b2aa64fab923969c8d7a73ee122d"
}
