📅 Original date posted:2016-06-18
📝 Original message:This works for segwit version 1 with the addition of also using a different
chain id.
I presume that segwit version 2 will be implementing schnorr signatures.
What do we know about the likely implementation details? Is there any way
to avoid using a third derivation path to support it?
Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet <http://breadwallet.com>;
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Following up to the discussion last month (
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012695.html
> ), ive prepared a proposal for a BIP here:
>
>
> https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki
>
>
> Any comments on it? Does anyone working on a BIP44 compliant wallet
> implement something different?
> If there are no objection, id also like to request a number for it.
>
> Thx,
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160617/e8e17b28/attachment.html>;
Aaron Voisine [ARCHIVE] /
npub18g…knkzl
2023-06-07 17:51:04
in reply to nevent1q…q0ft
Author Public Key
npub18gjvug29c4yg46lmplq38e75gg6wn5mn8taytckcsr4jt8p74h3s5knkzlPublished at
2023-06-07 17:51:04Event JSON
{
"id": "409875d543985b0ec43e0020a45b4a5f0e12251c74673a9feef18c1bd06f1944",
"pubkey": "3a24ce2145c5488aebfb0fc113e7d44234e9d3733afa45e2d880eb259c3eade3",
"created_at": 1686160264,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5796205e767f1898bab274ea210289039a9b04e259c9de0e7f909b5b5a69999a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bd1e31387d93961303e87fffa40826d58b4b76d780aa4698938d9a7680c1c81c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6b8e77368804013d7126ba4b77c7963bcfeff909135791531097d7a0f03ca85d"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-06-18\n📝 Original message:This works for segwit version 1 with the addition of also using a different\nchain id.\n\nI presume that segwit version 2 will be implementing schnorr signatures.\nWhat do we know about the likely implementation details? Is there any way\nto avoid using a third derivation path to support it?\n\n\nAaron Voisine\nco-founder and CEO\nbreadwallet \u003chttp://breadwallet.com\u003e\n\nOn Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Hi List,\n\u003e\n\u003e Following up to the discussion last month (\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012695.html\n\u003e ), ive prepared a proposal for a BIP here:\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Any comments on it? Does anyone working on a BIP44 compliant wallet\n\u003e implement something different?\n\u003e If there are no objection, id also like to request a number for it.\n\u003e\n\u003e Thx,\n\u003e Daniel\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160617/e8e17b28/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "8c31afb96b2ebf74091731c3303ddc4513ce9b5b2c1ce09c7a98c50b8081d5172cf88b7b0dab0ed4dbee6ad124a7100b17151065c751dfe04bb267acd59d6738"
}