📅 Original date posted:2015-12-19
📝 Original message:On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:49:25AM -0500, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I have done some calculation for the effect of a SW softfork on the
> actual total block size.
Note how the fact that segwit needs client-side adoption to enable an
actual blocksize increase can be a good thing: it's a clear sign that
the ecosystem as a whole has opted-into a blocksize increase.
Not as good as a direct proof-of-stake vote, and somewhat coercive as a
vote as you pay lower fees, but it's an interesting side-effect.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000188b6321da7feae60d74c7b0becbdab3b1a0bd57f10947d
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151219/4cda69f5/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 17:46:52
in reply to nevent1q…pp7l
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 17:46:52Event JSON
{
"id": "40855da6f78183260d49a04328d1f16a2b7a4121ceea0b0aa7b75df80335a282",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686160012,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"eff3da99eac05afc36c81f61bae65cf55926e9f41385e61b8dbdb638667e713b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"32ea940236789ab0ab53ea498d2da4411b3cfb088dd6ee36a127bc134bcc4350",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ab1c85bd5ad443631a95b228bd1630bf7acdb27f6de01a960ccfbb077831d7ec"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-12-19\n📝 Original message:On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:49:25AM -0500, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e I have done some calculation for the effect of a SW softfork on the\n\u003e actual total block size.\n\nNote how the fact that segwit needs client-side adoption to enable an\nactual blocksize increase can be a good thing: it's a clear sign that\nthe ecosystem as a whole has opted-into a blocksize increase.\n\nNot as good as a direct proof-of-stake vote, and somewhat coercive as a\nvote as you pay lower fees, but it's an interesting side-effect.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n00000000000000000188b6321da7feae60d74c7b0becbdab3b1a0bd57f10947d\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151219/4cda69f5/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "4bcea485158e33d75ef1097cc917bba5948fd0c78450492b94793b475eb6b2713f3d76778ea362c899dcea500369748b8fd3979cbf95fc87dcaec7232c03f3c3"
}