Drak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08 📝 Original message:On 8 December 2013 20:40, ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08
📝 Original message:On 8 December 2013 20:40, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
> > Right now I think Sirius still owns DNS for bitcoin.org which is
> nonsense.
> > He needs to pass it on to someone who is actually still involved with the
> > project. Again, the most obvious neutral candidate would be the
> Foundation.
>
> I am opposed to Bitcoin Foundation having control of Bitcoin.org, and
> I think it would be foolish of the foundation to accept it were it
> offered.
>
What do you suggest though? We will need to trust someone (even in a group
each person can act autonomously).
The only thing I can suggest would be to hand the keys to the bitcoin
project lead.
Otherwise, who has admin rights to the code projects
(github/sourceforge/this mailing list)? Those people have proven they can
be trusted so far.
Drak
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131208/7513277a/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:10:26Event JSON
{
"id": "40ff57c45986a7e5f1b839d19ff702ce43c8509588c6b05f5977eaeb7f8c15a5",
"pubkey": "50ece7cbb2dc316af1cd5da0d62e0e1fec40f20919242c8fbedd53702fba95db",
"created_at": 1686150626,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d517aa463a22abef5f03468f652eeefb44676da99926537d88111078c3e0468b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8497c37547502de7bcbcff56e52f05f119d2694544fa058b135926b6ff4622b1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08\n📝 Original message:On 8 December 2013 20:40, Gregory Maxwell \u003cgmaxwell at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Right now I think Sirius still owns DNS for bitcoin.org which is\n\u003e nonsense.\n\u003e \u003e He needs to pass it on to someone who is actually still involved with the\n\u003e \u003e project. Again, the most obvious neutral candidate would be the\n\u003e Foundation.\n\u003e\n\u003e I am opposed to Bitcoin Foundation having control of Bitcoin.org, and\n\u003e I think it would be foolish of the foundation to accept it were it\n\u003e offered.\n\u003e\n\nWhat do you suggest though? We will need to trust someone (even in a group\neach person can act autonomously).\nThe only thing I can suggest would be to hand the keys to the bitcoin\nproject lead.\n\nOtherwise, who has admin rights to the code projects\n(github/sourceforge/this mailing list)? Those people have proven they can\nbe trusted so far.\n\nDrak\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131208/7513277a/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "9f914a1ec810b5ff0179bef24ca426dfc6ecbbd3cf48da56129463108856df8735af3eaebb8a167dd99bfbeeafd231345021651936e98ff28c7979d7dc6d8f06"
}